It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NeoVain
reply to post by crankyoldman
In this case, an interpretation of something which very heavily relies on the programmers ability to.... well, I guess decide what is to be extracted and write a program to extract it, since he doesn't know what is there, he's kind of guessing
Exactly, they don´t know what it is, but they "think" it is a dust particle, so they program the imager to make it "go away". Next picture it is gone. Same thing happens again, and again. What are we really looking at here? The truth, or some heavily modified version, due to what some people "think" it should look like? That is the core of the problem here.
Maybe there is no dust at all, they are all alien spacecrafts, programmed to "disappear" from view. That would at least make more sense, considering NASAs own guidelines on the subject: Never to reveal any such findings to the public.
Oh and please name another factor that would be able to impart enough momentum on an internal dust particle to make it relocate, since you agreed it takes awhile, and i assume you also agree there was no such reported relocation at this time.
Sorry i thought this was a dumb question, beneath answering. You could use the same argument to say "Why is the sun always at exactly the same place in the frame, is it tracking STEREO B?"
since he doesn't know what is there, he's kind of guessing.
Maybe there is no dust at all, they are all alien spacecrafts, programmed to "disappear" from view.
The arguments against your (NASA's) explanations have merit.
First it was a bokeh, now its internal dust with a random cosmic ray perfectly placed to give the illusion of something shooting out of the anomaly.
Seems like someone with your space knowledge or intellect would grow tired or frustrated trying to prove your dust particle to people that are mostly obviously not your intellectual equal.
Either that's the object we see in the video thats to the left or its a planet. You decide.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Evildead
First it was a bokeh, now its internal dust with a random cosmic ray perfectly placed to give the illusion of something shooting out of the anomaly.
Apparently you don't understand the term bokeh. Bokeh is an effect which occurs when something is out of focus in an image. In this case it is a dust particle which is out of focus. It is a bokeh effect upon a dust particle.
Seems like someone with your space knowledge or intellect would grow tired or frustrated trying to prove your dust particle to people that are mostly obviously not your intellectual equal.
I don't know about others intellectual abilities but I do find it interesting to try to explain my point of view from various aspects. I often find it helps clarify my own understanding.
edit on 5/8/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)