I Am A Little Angry Right Now At Obama Supporters

So Obama was singing and "slow jamming" the news on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon
He shows up on talk shows every now and then
Sometimes makes comments about Jay-Z or Kanye West
Cracks Jokes....

He is beloved

But... when's the last time you saw him on the news in person answering tough questions?
Do I expect someone who is screwing the people to do so? No
But I expect the people to expect it.... yes absolutely!

Nobody cares that all he does is crack jokes
This guy is like an international mobster with the biggest Public Relations Department telling him how to move and the people are loving it!!!

How can the party that was the most vocal about Bush and the War accept this?
I understand many of those protesters weren't anti-war but just anti-republican, but some were authentic i guess.

I know many Obama supporters are now voting Ron Paul
But there are still many Obama supporters out there, and I just don't get it!

I can understand if you are a zombie watching american idol and glee all day but if you are aware of current events then how can you accept this?

No it's not a rant, a rant does not seek answers
I seek answers!

I think the last time he was cornered for tough questions...Fox was threatened with being thrown clear out of the White House Press Corps. It took ABC, NBC and the others rallying WITH Fox to stop it. Amazing to see them come together and quite a statement for how outrageous they're willing to be if media forgets it's "place" in not making the big guy look too bad for the world.

I really can't wait for him to be out of Office so the stories that are there to be told aren't hidden for fear of being utterly destroyed for sharing it. I'll bet we're reading about these years with fascination and horror for many many years after he's out of the Oval.

reply to post by ModernAcademia


Now, now, just relax. Breathe in, breathe out...
On second thought, breathe in, and yell the strongest you can when you breathe out.
Feeling better?

The Presidents are just puppets under their masters. Republicans, democrats, all the same thing according to Hidden Hand. Just faces and masks.

reply to post by ModernAcademia


I can understand if you are a zombie watching american idol and glee all day but if you are aware of current events then how can you accept this?


Most are concerned about his color, not character...so, there is one possible answer.


And anyways, why do you care MA..? You actually want them agreeing with you..? If that were to happen, who else would you Rant about once a week..?

reply to post by facelift


Oh, yeah it has nothing to do with this?

On December 31, 2011 he signed the National Defense Authorization Act with sections 1021 and 1022, military arrests and indefinite detention without due process of the law.

On March 8, 2012 he signed Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011, the no-Trespass Bill, paving the way for the military arrests and detention of any who might oppose his regime.

On March 16, 2012 he signed the Executive Order, National Defense Resources Preparedness, which was portrayed in the mainstream media as a reaffirmation of existing law. However that law was only to take effect in the event of a nuclear attack on the United States. Under Obama’s new version the law can be implemented in the case of an emergency. This could be any kind of emergency, even an economic one, or as the law now states, no emergency at all.

Obama was recently caught over an open mic telling a Russian Ambassador, “After my next election I have more flexibility.”

On Monday, Obama, in addressing the Supreme Court in reference to his socialist heath care law, said that the “unelected” justices should show restraint in the face of arguments for overturning the law.
fromthetrenchesworldreport.com...

They want a guy who will give them everything they want instead of what they need.

The death of a Democracy is when people find out they can vote themselves money.

And really that is why the Democrats get voted in to power.

reply to post by swan001

You know, I've been hearing for years how Presidents don't control this..or that..and have no power to make our life better or worse.

Why is it then...that in thinking back...I can clearly see the difference in my standard of life and quality of living in America between Daddy, Clinton, Baby and Obama? 4 Presidents...4 VERY VERY different America's I've lived in under each of them.

I think the President and the men he appoints to run things below him have a whole lot more to do with how good or bad our life is than people want to give credit or blame for.

reply to post by ModernAcademia

I understand many of those protesters weren't anti-war but just anti-republican, but some were authentic i guess.

See, up until you said something as asinine as that, I was with you. honestly man, it must be tough living in your reality, where people will actually go protest against wars just to give the republicans a good what for.

honestly. I refuse to believe you believe that.

reply to post by Wrabbit2000


Maybe that to avoid suspicion, the hidden powers makes sure that every president do something different. That's how I would do it if I were them, or else I would get caught.

reply to post by Wrabbit2000

I think the President and the men he appoints to run things below him have a whole lot more to do with how good or bad our life is than people want to give credit or blame for.

Yeah that's why Obama was able to ram through all of his socialist and liberal policies. Oh wait, all of them, including Obamacare, got gutted. The president is a figurehead and really, without the support of congress and the senate, he has no real power, the president, regardless of what Baby Bush had to say about it, really doesn't have that much say.

The president can't just up and take unilateral action, he's brought to task over it, don't believe me? Go take a look at what obamacare WAS and then look at what actually ended up being in it. That's how much power the president has.

reply to post by phishyblankwaters

@ Swan

LOL... That answer was so unexpected, I gave ya a star despite disagreeing! lol

@Phishyblankwaters

I honestly don't know what their problem is. I mean Presidents as a whole. Clinton played it right....Daddy Bush never had the chance to see. not really.... However, Baby Bush and Obama have BOTH had years of their Presidency where they not only had some control but ABSOLUTE AND TOTAL control of Congress. Both sides..and by enough majority to make the minority sit in a corner and pout. They both had that advantage...and they both wasted it and let it slide away without much being done.

So... So why Obama only got part of his stuff passed? Well.. same problem with why bush screwed the nation for 8 years despite having the power to change things for part of that time. Why both Presidents couldn't KEEP their accomplishments, for the most part, is no mystery. They BOTH lost that Congressional Control to the end of their terms..and watched what they did be taken apart by the other party with much fanfare and glee. Both parties have done it now in a 10 year period.

reply to post by ModernAcademia


Malcom X would tear him a new one.

Anyone that votes for Obama is a chump and a traitor.

Malcolm hated Democrats and he saw them for what they are.

What's the difference between Obama and Romney supporters? They are the same damned candidate. It's not like you can say, "why don't you cheer for an alternative?" There is no alternative. This election is a sham.

He took questions from the press April 3rd. March 6th and thats just two recent ones. But he is also expected to stay low and out of the press while Republicans have there spot light to find a challenger for the White House.

I hate to ruin your propaganda of the POTUS is hiding.

Originally posted by swan001
reply to post by Wrabbit2000

 

Maybe that to avoid suspicion, the hidden powers makes sure that every president do something different. That's how I would do it if I were them, or else I would get caught.

That is how the Hegelian dialectic works, by pitting two opposites against each other coming up with the synthesis, which is neither right nor left, and incidentally this is why I believe that leftists think the current Prez is more right and the right think he is far left, because the synthesis is the NWO, neither right nor left which is where the most recent Presidents reside.
I must give the late Antony Sutton the credit for this viewpoint, as he wrote about it in his book, "America's Secret Establishment".
The Shadow Government, the CFR, the Bilderbergs, and Skull and Bones run things behind the scenes and always have to have a front man. For this thing to work, things always have to swing back and forth on the spectrum.

He is clearly abusing the "Presidential Order" and using it in a way never intended to circumvent Congress illegally.

His appointees heading agencies are also creating Laws out of thin air and legally have no power to do so. By simply labeling a law a regulation with penalties, that are in fact taxes, they circumvent the law.

The Senate has broken their own law by failing to pass a single budget since Obama took office. Reid won't even let one come to the floor. Why? Even the Senators know if they do as Obama wishes their careers are over and some are simply to honest to play along. Reid knows that, so he does not want the fact the Democrats won't pass what Obama wants on the record. A child could figure this out.

Pelosi recently started to work towards "amending" a Constitutional Amendment, the First Amendment in fact. Of course that is not possible so they must have something up their sleeve. The idea is to remove the Right to Free Speech from "Corporations" when it comes to Political Speech. This is the real reason for the phony Class Warfare gambit. You see all Media and even Political Parties are all, you guessed it, corporations.

Those with honest memories will recall two other attempts to silence Free Speech and a Free Press.

The CEO of GE and NBC including all news divisions was a top adviser to Obama while he had complete control of NBC News and MSNBC. When people took note and it threatened to interfere with their plans, Immelt sold NBC. It made no difference at all and now MoveOn has been proven to provide the topics and spin on the topics they report. One positive outcome though is that ABC appears to have cleaned up their act and surprisingly are now engaging in honest reporting again. The worm has turned so to speak. They smell a loser.

When at the last State of the Union Address, President Obama clearly said he was going to ask Congress to extend his powers (meaning willingly allow him to usurp Congressional Powers to Legislate), it got zero attention. It should have made the hair on the backs of everyone's necks stand up.

How do they get away with this? Easy. Holder represents Obama and his Ideology instead of the People. They have no fear of legal repercussions as Obama controls the Justice Dept.. He also has just enough of the Senate behind him to guarantee he wont be thrown out of office.

Somehow he has gotten his supporters to ignore the fact he lied to get in office, broke most of his promises and that he and the Democrats had total control of the government for two years, yet his ideas were so bad he still could not pass a budget which requires a simple majority. You simply cannot define a less effective leadership than that. Incompetence at the highest level was exhibited.

Now he has been campaigning for months with the taxpayers being illegally stuck with the bill for it. He just announced his campaign will start soon as if he had not been campaigning at all yet. He got a very pricey bus for his campaign for free in the process, which I believe under normal circumstances would end his career.

Actually I do understand why his supporters seem to be deaf, blind and dumb so often. His target audience are people who ignore the world around them, vote out of habit no caring who is on the ballot as long as the name is followed by a "D". He targets the illiterate and the poor who seldom know what is going on as the Progressives have always done. They see those less fortunate as willing victims and their personal property.

reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus


Your making it way to complex. Power is the most addictive, most powerful drug in existence. Nothing other than the quest for power is needed to explain all they do. No complex secret societies or impossible to keep secret conglomerates are now or were ever needed. Those seeking a fix for their drug addiction will naturally gather together out of necessity.

reply to post by Blaine91555


If power is so addictive, don't ya think that the real power controls the two parties of our politics? It won't let go, ever. Why do you think we can insult so much the President without getting internet banned? That's because we are not attacking the true power. ThirdeyeHorus is absolutely right. He did reasearches and I can confirm he knows what he's talking about.

reply to post by Blaine91555


Wow, your post makes sense to me in every way. A brilliant analysis I say. Thank you. I believe you are coming from a truly Constitutionalist viewpoint and I agree with your analysis.

Oops, wait, I'm making what too complex? I consider myself a Constitutionalist and agree with your analysis, but I am still a conservative leaning person. I still see Obama as a Left Hegelian, in fact one of the more leftist Presidents at least since Wilson and FDR but definitely in their model. Lots of people here may see me as too biased, but I have always viewed communism and socialism as two facets of the same stone, only one is more drastic than the other. Fascism is also a leftist ideology, though in Hegelian dialectical reasoning, they pit communism against fascism and claim that fascism is a right ideology. It is in the scenario they put it, but it does not mean it is a conservative ideology. Fascism is just another aspect of World Totalitarian authoritarian control. Some Left Hegelians view authoritarianism as a right ideology and believe that if they impose anarchy they are opposing authoritarianism thus choosing more freedom, but I think nothing could be further from the truth. Communists have used anarchist revolutionary means to destroy a society of norms and replace it with authoritarian Totalitarian communism.
My point is I believe in freedom and liberty but not in doing whatever one wants without regard to consequences of how it affects others and society. I believe there has to be a reasonable balance.
On communist websites they may claim they are anti war, but as I said in another post, they tend to be anti war if it suits their agenda and pro war if it supports leftist guerilla revolutionaries. For some strange reason, leftists do not seem to want to admit that Obama is every bit of their ideology as they are. Perhaps some of these are drawn into the anti-war movement and do not realize the agenda behind it.

I might add that Hegelian dialectical reasoning was introduced to American educational institutions by members of Skull and Bones and Yale University, by those who went to Germany and studied in the University of Berlin. This is historical and not an opinion. Members of Skull and Bones have instituted this philosophy in the schools and political institutions since then. Why else would there never be any traction in more than the two foremost opposing political parties, namely the republican and democrat parties? Even the communist party, while denying that Obama himself may be a communist at heart, still insist that he is the best representative on their behalf. Why does the communist party agree with the Democrat Party platform more than Republican? Because they are the Left Hegelians.

I do also agree with you that the motive is power and control, but given that, TPTB run things according to whatever modus operandi gives them the power, control, and money.

Originally posted by swan001
reply to post by Blaine91555

 

If power is so addictive, don't ya think that the real power controls the two parties of our politics? It won't let go, ever. Why do you think we can insult so much the President without getting internet banned? That's because we are not attacking the true power. ThirdeyeHorus is absolutely right. He did reasearches and I can confirm he knows what he's talking about.

Of course power is what has corrupted both Parties. We are however discussing Obama here. The D's and the R's are equally corrupt. One of the biggest lies going here is that one is any better than the other.

I criticize a Democrat, I'm assumed to be a Republican. I criticize a Republican, I'm assumed to be a Democrat. That works heavily in their favor. Anything that divides us, enables them. They know most people are incapable of grasping that. We are emotional beings and many of us will stand our political ground in knowing full well what I said is true. Many of us are willing victims who view these things like a sporting event. That human weakness has always made their task easier.

On topic with Obama. You could easily assemble an hour long video of Obama lying, contradicting himself or saying one thing to one group and another to a different group. Anyone who has been following along knows for a fact that is true. So, why do people continue to support him?

They support him because they see something in it for them. They are willing to sell out their Freedoms for selfish reasons. Those benefiting from handouts for votes for instance are willing pawns. This gives them the edge they need to keep their power since the majority are that easy to manipulate.