The full article.
For some reason people have been having trouble opening links or watching videos found throughout the threads on ATS. For that reason and the
importance of the information within I will post it almost in its entirety. Minus all the footnotes and other links within. I do so with full
permission from the author himself.
Intro: There are some patriots out there that say that Expatriation is the wrong thing to do in freeing oneself from the system. We beg to differ-
herein are some legal authorities:
Expatriation and the legal Entailments: First definition of expatriation,
Expatriation. A voluntary change of Allegiance from one country to another, effecting an absolute termination of all civil and political rights as of
the date of such act.
3 am j2d Aliens 120.
Above definition is from Ballentine's Law Dictionary, 3rd edition. Note that the definition refers to American Juris Prudence in regard to ALIENS.
Now, below is the general definition of an alien that is found in a current edition of American Heritage Dictionary:
Alien. Owing political allegiance to another country or government.
Americans have never owed political fidelity to the federal government, because it is not nor ever was a true national government. Moreover, the
definition of alien states one owes political allegiance to a government. With those stated facts established:
Question: Are your political rights derived from the federal government or the Federal Constitution? Answer: NO.
Now to evidence the fact that the government entitled the federal government ie the United States----is not a bona fide national government----or in
other words---that it does not represent a nation, per se. See this definition from Black's Law Dictionary, 4th edition:
National Government. A national government is a government of a single state or nation, united as a community by what is termed the social compact,
and possessing complete and perfect supremacy over persons and things, so far as they can be made the lawful objects of civil government. A federal
government of a community of independent and sovereign states, united by compact.
In further evidence that the United States is not actually a country or a nation, the Articles of Confederation---which were overwritten by the United
States Constitution--- are essentially a compact by the several states of the union. Now, in retrospect, take look at this definition which pertains
to The War Between the States, which is wrongly referred to as the Civil War:
Rebels. A term loosely but incorrectly applied to the Confederate Forces engaged in the Civil War. 30 am J Rev ed insurr 2.
Why were the Confederates not considered rebels?... There was no breach of allegiance to their state governments or nations, nor did they commit
treason against the American Union to a foreign power. They had a lawful war pursuant to the doctrines of international law. As a matter of law it
was not even a civil war---it was an international war.
Now you may be saying to yourself: Well, if one expatriates, he would have to leave the United States or what most people think of as is the country.
For some odd reason this is the trend of thought. However as we have stated herein above the United States is NOT a country under principles of
international law; the United States is a federation of countries. It is deemed a country internally under the color---or rather---fraud of the 14th
Amendment and some colorful applications of international law. Under international law your state is your lawful country and nation. See the
definition from Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856 as proof:
Country. By country is meant the STATE of which one is a member.
Now this question, how can you owe allegiance to all states if they are all separate countries?
The above was referenced to lay the groundwork for you to understand the following:
Firstly, the United States is an incorporation or federation of countries, it is not a country. So the question is, how can one have a bona fide
nationality of a federation or corporation?
Secondly, the devious 14th Amendment establishes a so-called dual citizenship. And because the 14th established a so-called dual citizenship---and as
it would violate due process of law after the installment of the amendment---the term noted as citizen of the United States can ONLY MEAN a United
States citizen or federal citizen when used in authorities of law. Accordingly, in view of such matters, we must ask these two questions:
1) Can a person participate in elections without being a United States citizen under the 14th Amendment? Answer: NO. Then he does not have political
rights unless he is claiming to be a citizen of the U.S.---does he? And, if one were to participate, would he not be deemed a citizen of the U.S?
2) Because the (new) federal government has set-up a (new) system of law which is grounded in Roman Civil Law under the 14th that establishes rights
that are repugnant to the common law, by expatriation would one not be giving-up these rights, e.g. title 42 suits? Answer: YES.
Now look at the definition of expatriation again to see if the foregoing facts fit:
Expatriation. A voluntary change of allegiance from one country to another, effecting an absolute termination of all civil and political rights as of
the date such act.
So are you still saying that expatriation is not the proper, legal way to remove yourself from the government system and its 14th Amendment bondage?
Are you saying to yourself the 14 Amendment is a fraud and you do not have to expatriate? Well, these questions are asked...And remember ignorance of
the law is no excuse is a maxim of law:
1) Have you signed any government form or participated in any activity that states you must be a citizens of the U.S. e.g voting in any or all state
or federal elections or sign any Social Security or other benefit/taxation form that requires you to be a U.S citizen?
2) Because only U.S citizens can vote, and under established international doctrines of law a child carries the nationality of his father, did your
father participate in any U.S. elections in his lifetime?
Now we must ask: After a 140+ years of the 14th Amendment system being in place, do you really think there is not a presumption or established fact
that you are regarded as a citizen and national of the U.S. by government agencies and judges? Have you heard of a thing called legal fictions? Have
you ever heard that possession is nine tenths of the law? Who possesses the territories known as the several states? The NEW citizens of the U.S, or
the lawful citizens that existed prior the amendment? So, whose law system rules then?
And in closing, below is the legal definition of ALIEN from a legal source that is not common to the legal profession, but many of the judges in
America use, Ballentine's Law Dictionary:
Alien, one who, having been a citizen of the United States, has expatriated himself. 3rd edition.
Now look at this definition established by the insurgent U.S Congress:
Title 8 USC 1101 (a)(3). The term ALIEN means any person NOT a citizen or national of the United States.