It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dontreally
I think it's perfectly reasonable to believe that the Sheikhs and Imams of Islam base their sharia on metaphysical considerations - i.e. the ACTUAL significance of their religion, rather than anything else...
Originally posted by dontreally
Call it mystical, or ideological, whatever word you prefer, it is definitely the basic ingredient for why the world's elite have always picked on the Jews.
Originally posted by dontreally
The hundreds of deaths during the Hajj each year (from getting trampled to death) perfectly reflects this metaphysics: In their euphoria, the only thought the worshiper has is of Allah (the Absolute, which means getting as close as possible to the Ka'aba)
Originally posted by dontreally
Basically, and simply put, Judaism puts more stock into the realm of "appearance" - something Islam does not
"Metaphysical" doesn't mean the same thing as "mystical"
thought up and decided that it sounded cool
The deaths each year during Hajj have less to do with fanatical worship in an attempt to get close to the Ka'aba, and more to do with cramming 4 million people in 0.35 square kilometres. Unfortunately, they don't fit your extended metaphor...these deaths don't usually occur due to anyone trying to get closer to the Ka'aba. In fact, muslims only need to circumambulate the ka'aba...there is no need to get near it.
sm based religions and mystical aspects of religions...so many words for so little meaning. The point being, if you ask a muslim about the significance of Hajj, you're probably not even going to get 1 in 500 to go on about how the Ka'aba symbolises God, and the desert is this reality
That's accidental (secondary) to the primary metaphysical (symbolic) reason. All human gatherings, btw, have the power to create a sense of community. Religion is not - and should not - be thought of only in that way. In my opinion, that is definitely an important aspect, but I don't think it is more primary then the philosophical (or personal) experience of God that religion can provide.
More likely they'll tell you it is a pillar of worship, or that it builds a sense of community, or some such thing.
Also, you speak about the "Absolute" and "eternal" and talk about how it is separate from God being the "Creator", and thus having separate names in Judaism. I'm not sure what you are on about here
"Only Judaism puts stock in the realm of appearance".
Meh, I'm not sure I agree with them...
if you understood Rabbinic parlance, is really just equating Islam with Noahidism (which is the rule of law); Islam takes law and blows it completely out of proportion - everything becomes conditioned and smothered by law - every tiny detail about life becomes regimented, something which the ultra Orthodox Jews are amenable to - but, this is not what should be implied by Noahidism.
Originally posted by dontreally
Metaphysical tends to be regarded as the intellectual (or discursive) aspect of what I gingerly term 'the mystical"; If by mystical, is meant the experience of God, the metaphysical is that instruction which guide and helps explain the mystical experience, therefore, the metaphysical and mystical are both usually codified under the term "esoteric".
Originally posted by dontreally
If you prefer to look at religion that way, that's your opinion.
Originally posted by dontreally
And you still think that is normal? I never said it was a conscious metaphor - but it is still nonetheless reflective of the ontological dynamic I've been describing: in their zeal, they ignore the fact that people are being trampled beneath their feet.
And if this happens every single year, why don't the authorities do something to prevent it from happening?
Originally posted by dontreally
I am quite aware of that, I never said that every Muslim was indoctrinated into this tradition - on the contrary, very few Muslims are acquainted with the inner metaphysical basis of their religious beliefs.
Originally posted by dontreally
Even though I'm not a Muslim, I will admit that the symbolism is quite profound; the world, creation, the realm of appearance, being treated as lifeless in itself (aptly conveyed by the desert) with the city of Mecca the realm of the holy, the Kaaba as the intellectual apprehension of Allah, and the stone inside, the ineffable mystery of that connection - the symbolism is great indeed - how could such an idea not enrich the religious feelings of the average Muslim? If he's intellectually able, why reject such an interpretation when it makes so much sense - when the world we exist in, very much, is a physical expression of an ontological reality?
Only the Rabbis who speak what you want to hear get your approval, right?
The Rabbis who equate Islam with Noahidism, are indirectly admitting that there there is no conflict between the concept of God in Islam and Judaism.
and that Jewish and Islamic monotheism are identical.
According to Annemarie Schimmel, "the Malāmatīs deliberately tried to draw the contempt of the world upon themselves by committing unseemly, even unlawful, actions, but they preserved perfect purity of thought and loved God without second thought" (Schimmel 86).
What is God?", "What is the soul?", "How did I get here?"
You ever been in a large crowd of people, and then some at the back start pushing forward?
Actually, anyone with the capability to read and comprehend the Quran is acquainted with the metaphysical basis of their religious beliefs.
God having different names doesn't make different Gods.
The concept of God as the Creator is the same God as the "Absolute".
Why would God behave differently in the role of the Creator than he would as "himself"?
Islam doesn't separate or ignore reality in favour of what you are calling "The Absolute".
The Torah, however, clearly advocates death for apostates.
But then again, it seems you do not mind when the Rabbis oppose the your scriptures, which I guess in this case is a good thing.
"wack the necks of non-muslims with a stick when they are paying taxes"
Al-Zamakhshari, a Mu’tazili author of a commentary on the Qur’an, said that “the Jizyah shall be taken from them with belittlement and humiliation. The dhimmi shall come in person, walking not riding. When he pays, he shall stand, while the tax collector sits. The collector shall seize him by the scruff of the neck, shake him, and say “Pay the Jizyah!” and when he pays it he shall be slapped on the nape of the neck.”
"make them walk on the left when passing muslims".
Hossein Nasr is an Iranian University Professor of Islamic studies at George Washington University, and a prominent Islamic philosopher. He is the author of many scholarly books and articles
link
Originally posted by dontreally
Thanks for the Jab. I disagree. Most would regard those questions as being of a more 'theological' import, rather than a pure metaphysics.
Metaphysics:
the branch of philosophy that treats of first principles, includes ontology (the nature of existence and being) and cosmology(the origin and general structure of the universe), and is intimately connected with epistemology (the origin and nature of human knowledge).
...
Mysticism:
a doctrine of an immediate spiritual intuition of truths believed to transcend ordinary understanding, or of a direct, intimate union of the soul with God through contemplation or ecstasy.
...
Esoteric:
understood by or meant for only the select few who have special knowledge or interest
Originally posted by dontreally
I would say the Quran is rather vague in giving a systematic explanation of Islam (for instance, what the various names of God mean philosophically, etc, all this necessitates a deeper understanding) - there is always an oral explanation (and according to Sufis, this explanation was handed down with the Quran).
Originally posted by dontreally
Who cares what the Quran does or doesn't say! This is what Islamic jurists have legislated in many different Islamic lands and at different times in Islamic history to the Jews or Christians who lived in it's territories.
Where do you get that reasoning from How much do you know of either of these religions
I care. Muslims care. It is the basis of the religion. Not what Islamic jurists have to say. But since you bring that up, most scholars agree that the "Pact of Umar" (the document with this talk of hitting non-muslims with sticks and having them walk on the left and wear special clothes) is an inauthentic forgery (it was never a historical document, certainly not a Pact by Umar). Some say it was invented by the mad Caliph Al-Hakim in an attempt to justify his persecution of the non-muslims.
In one part you say that the Quran is vague, and therefore needs supplementary materials, then in another part you negate yourself and say that it is quite explicit
Originally posted by dontreally
Read: "The Legacy of Jihad". Your idea of Muslim persecution of non-muslims being 'aberrant' is so outrageously far from the truth.
Saladdin
As for your other examples, you think violence is exclusive to Muslims?
Originally posted by dontreally
Saladdin
Kurds have always been nicer than Arabs.
"Fatwa" is an edict of assassination? I'm sorry, but you've fallen victim to pop culture media.
While in the course of your discussions about the persecution of Jews it would make sense that you'd knock on Islam, but I never took you to be racist, dontreally. Please don't start now!
The dubbing of Palestinians as "Amalekites" is particularly noteworthy in the context of what was commanded to be done to the Amalekites.
e effects of which we can clearly see today in the way Israel handles the Palestinians.
The Hebrew Bible clearly and explicitly "gives" everything from the Nile to the Euphrates to the Jews.
You're not going to find "dashing babies heads" in the Quran. I
If you wish to remain neutral (and perhaps not let the Jews pass through your land to make attacks further on, like Sihon)? Too bad. You must die. Heck, you don't even have to be one of these "nations" to be attacked by the Jews. The Hebrew Bible has instructions for that situation as well (you can offer them peace-through enslavement- first, and if they don't accept, you only have to slaughter all the men, and you an keep the cattle and women and children for yourself). edit on 19-4-2012 by babloyi because: (no reason g
Surah 2:190-193 "Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits
but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression."
While in the course of your discussions about the persecution of Jews it would make sense that you'd knock on Islam, but I never took you to be racist, dontreally. Please don't start now!
The Sharia (literally "the path leading to the watering place") is Islamic law formed by traditional Islamic scholarship, which most Muslim groups adhere to. In Islam, Sharia is the expression of the divine will, and "constitutes a system of duties that are incumbent upon a Muslim by virtue of his religious belief".[63] Islamic law covers all aspects of life, from matters of state, like governance and foreign relations, to issues of daily living.