The Chemtrail Hoax, page 20
Pages: <<  17    18    19    20    21    22    23  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 24 times


reply posted on 5-7-2005 @ 04:18 PM by microcosm
HR and OTS get big kudos for pointing out that there are jets in the sky, and supersaturation is the process of cloudforming...

This is not the only reason they got kudos.

OTS got thanks from me for putting together a very well written, and informative thread that aims to finally lay this "chem trail" hoax to rest... and in my mind it does just that. Not only that but he is "in the know", due to his life experiances, and line of work.

HR also gets thanks for playing a large role in this thread; in the laying down of this "chemtrail" nonsense.

There are many others whom have participated in this thread such as FatherLukeDuke, as well as Defcon 5 (another person "in the know", due to his life experiances, and line of work.) I'm sure that there are many others that deserve thanks for their info, and help in debunking the hoax, but OTS, and HR stand the strongest in my mind.

Just about every argument "the other team" (as you put it) has been rebutted by HR, and OTS. Since the beggining of this topic they've stood firmly in their position, meanwhile you guys get knocked down, and come up with some new outlandish claim...

First people were saying... the "chemtrail", contrail phenomena is only present in the US. Afterwards it was shown that it takes place in Australia, The UK, Asia, as well as other places.

Then you guys brought up... There has to be chemtrails... when I look at the sky I look at one plane, and the contrail dissappears, then I look at another one in the same place 5 minutes later and it stays for 4 hours, and makes me dizzy, and my head explodes. Afterwards OTS, and HR show that the atmosphere is not constant, it's different in different areas, and elevations. You cannot tell altitude by simply looking straight up... chances are they're not in the same area.

Then we move on to Hah! well chemtrails were not present prior the 1990's! HR shows tons of images from the 50's of contrails being made. You guys then jump onto the next thing...

AHA! We have testimony from some guy who claims to be a flight technician! OTS shows that the document is years old, and has been debunked time, and time again in the past.

Hmm... everytime they spray I get sick out my mind, explain that!!! OTS, and HR inform you that spraying at such high altitudes would be highly ineffective, and chances are any spray being sprayed would be blown miles away.

Hmm... How do you explain why "chemtrails" get thin, and sheetlike!!? HR explains what cirrus clouds are, and how upper level winds effect contrails.

How do you explain the parrallel lines! HR explains that the wind is moving at a certain speed, and the plane is also moving at a certain speed.

Fast foward 2 days later, and 10 new claims (that get debunked by OTS, and HR); now were here...

AHA! How do you explain these patents... theres so many patents surely something is up!

OTS, and HR should get ATS votes for having to deal with you guys. No matter how many times you guys get knocked over, you guys keep on coming, and coming... theres a conspiracy out there, and you guys sure as hell are gonna find it... just not here though... Because chemtrails are bogus.

[edit on 7/5/05 by microcosm]


reply posted on 6-7-2005 @ 08:17 AM by Off_The_Street
billybob, if you want to believe in "chem-trails", you certainly may. And, dh, if you want to leave this site because no one agrees with your views and other people keep challenging them, you, of course, may do so, too.

The "chem-trail" fad, even among conspiracy-theorists, is pretty much over. Most conspiracy theorists, although they may tend to accept assertions or hypotheses without the same rigor used by scientists, are intelligent people. They realize that when the overwhelming preponderance of evidence points one way or the other, then that's probably what the facts of the matter are.

But I think you both need to understand that my friends and colleagues like Father Luke, Howard, APC, Microcosm, and others, really believe that our "job" here, as members of ATS, is to deny ignorance.

I challenge a lot of ideas I don't agree with, besides chemtrails. Sometimes people come up with arguments to change my mind, maybe I come up with arguments to change their minds. That's the way it's supposed to work, near as I can figure.

Some people believe things on faith; there is nothing wrong with that. Usually those beliefs are considered "religion" and the believers-on-faith (and I include myself among them) will not try to debate them, since we believe those things in our heart and cannot prove them one way or another. I would not challenge your religious beliefs, because how can I provide proof or evidence for something which does not even involve proof?

I think many people believe in "chem-trails" more as a religion than as anything rational. You reject any attempts at evidence or proof, because those things simply don't seem to fit into your "weltanschauung".

But as long as you claim belief based on evidence, people at ATS will challenge your beliefs based on your evidence (or lack thereof).


reply posted on 6-7-2005 @ 02:47 PM by billybob
it's weather modification to reduce global warming.
don't you guys listen?
the idea is to reflect some of the sun's, energy back into space.
that's the main one, however, man's need to have the powers of a god, 'will' force him to use his knowledge of atmospherics as a weapon, and to modify his enviroment to his whims.
this is why the military wants to 'own the weather' by 2020.
this is why millions of dollars(at LEAST, or hundreds of millions, or BILLIONS) in equipment(already posted and linked, no rehash, sorry), patents(already posted and linked, no rehash, sorry), program designs(already posted and linked, no rehash, sorry), testing equipment(thank you, howard), global warming/contrail studies(thank you, howard) have been spent on the feasibilty of atmospheric modification. HELLO!? MCFLY???

the best 'how' i've heard, is a higher concentration of particulates in the exhaust, or perhaps sprayed particulates (it's a new project, and i'm sure they improve the process constantly), or perhaps a fibrous material (microfibres) are added to the atmosphere. these particulates pretty much stay up there for a long time, and help cloud formation.

you know, lads.
even if it's NOT a spraying program(i'm not a hardcore chemtrail believer, i'm a hardcore POSSIBILITY and PROBABILITY of chemtrails believer), i personally am very concerned about the possibility that we are polluting the hell out of earth. if every time a jet goes up, it leaves a trail of cloudforming nuclei behind it, then we WILL have more and more cloud cover, and it will affect the weather, whether it is a consious spraying program or not.
as scientists, does this not concern you?

p.s. sorry microcosm for being harsh. i appreciate you taking this to your professor. that's a definite added value to the thread.


reply posted on 7-7-2005 @ 12:00 PM by billybob
well, apc thank you for your update on me. i THOUGHT i was feeling rather weightless on my reverse cycle.

the internet has many official, big budget, legally liable sites on line. smacking it down with the wave of a word? i don't think so.
and, anyways, many of these conspiracies were around before the net.
ever heard of jordan maxwell? he's being writing books about the illuminati and the all-pervasiveness of their symbols since the SIXTIES. he's got a website, if you're interested. you can probably order some of his 'books' from there.

what you are calling mind control is not really the same as directly beaming thoughts into someone's mind. you might find the work of marshall mcluhan interesting, if you have 'noticed' how integrated our personal minds are, with the collective unconscious, that is, media. (once again, this is in 'books')

how about, 'angels don't play this h.a.a.r.p.? nonsense?

a simple subsonic tone will make people nervous. that is a basic example of the type of mind control i'm talking about.
did you know that the term 'brainwashing' has had it's meaning flipped 180 degrees? remember pavlov? he had several programmed lab animals, a result of his conditioning experiments. there was a flood, and all the animals were caught in it. when pavlov had rounded the animals up again, he found that their conditioning had been erased. and that is what 'brainwashing' really is. you wash conditioning and programming away.

i think 911 may have acted like a great brainwasher for many of us.

out here in nothingness, everything floats.


reply posted on 8-7-2005 @ 12:35 AM by apc
what you are calling mind control is not really the same as directly beaming thoughts into someone's mind.

Thats just it... there is no need to. People are easy enough to control through events and dis/information.

And Pavlov showed that trauma can have a profound effect on conditioned response to stimulus. The structure is still present, however a new much more powerful set of interactions have been placed over it. Nothing has been 'washed' away. The conditioned responses can be very rapidly regained through simple triggering.


i think 911 may have acted like a great brainwasher for many of us.

In my opinion, you are dead on right. By allowing ourselves to suffer such a traumatic event, we gave ourselves the ability to consciously pursue oil we had no claim to. We have known for more than half a century that we would have no choice but to fight over oil. But how could we do it? We couldn't just out of the blue invade one of the oil-holding countries... no that would be bad. Instead, we picked someone (maybe even programmed him, I dont know Im not CIA) who fit the profile, trained him, and gave him everything he needed to grow and develop into someone that would eventually strike back at us. We let it happen. We needed to get the oil. We got the ball rolling with Desert Storm, but we couldn't finish it then and still be politically sound while wrapping up some other issues. We had to let ourselves be attacked in order to give us grounds to strike. Are we just in our ignorance? Well, technically, yes. Is this a bad thing? Not sure yet.
Point being, you're right 9-11 was permitted to take place as a practice of mind control on the American people and the rest of the world. You can thank Operation Paperclip for the tactic.

There is absolutely no sense in spraying something into the air so that some research project can beam thoughts into all our minds. What about 'them?' Will 'they' just be wearing special helmets so they too are not suddenly craving Big Macs and copies of Martha Stewart's latest book? It is far easier and much more proven to warp and shape people's thoughts by letting them think for themselves. Nothing can convince anyone of anything better than their own words, so why bother trying to nuke their brains?
Pages: <<  17    18    19    20    21    22    23  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Chem Trail Link - They Are Killing Your Brain.
  Posted 13 days ago with 33 member flags
Chemtrails spraying is making us sick
  Posted 15 days ago with 28 member flags
Heavy "Spraying"* in Phoenix Today 2-1-12
  Posted 12 days ago with 13 member flags
Chemtrail Believer Since 2011
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags
Breathing Chemtrails is bad for your health
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags