It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Marriage is a union between a man and a women. Let gays find some other name for a 'civil partnership' but not 'marriage'.
Originally posted by Annee
You ever read the history of marriage?
Women had no rights. Were property - - bought - sold - bartered - used for political alliances - - etc.
Originally posted by Annee
Marriage is a contract to protect rights and property of those joining together as one household. That is all it is.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Annee
You ever read the history of marriage?
Women had no rights. Were property - - bought - sold - bartered - used for political alliances - - etc.
So you are attacking the institution of marriage but advocating 'marriage' for gay couples. What did gays ever do to you?
Besides, why don't gays make do with all of the civil rights of a marriage (note: this is a Scottish case where gays can have a civil partnership) and keep on calling it a 'civil partnership' instead of demanding the right to call it a 'marriage'?
Originally posted by Annee
Why don't gays "make do"? Really?
Because they are 100% equal to heteros.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Annee
Why don't gays "make do"? Really?
Because they are 100% equal to heteros.
Equal but different.
Are mother equal to fathers?
Yes they are.
Does that mean that mothers should demand the right (in law) to be called 'father'?
Equal but different.
Originally posted by Annee
NO - - not equal but different.
100% Equal.
Originally posted by Annee
Laws are being enacted right now to change legal forms from "mother" "father" to "parent 1 and parent 2".
Originally posted by Annee
Laws are being enacted right now to change legal forms from "mother" "father" to "parent 1 and parent 2".
Originally posted by Annee
Mother/Father are gender bias words. They are not a necessity.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Who cares if marriage means of the same sex or different? Marriage isn't a religious thing, its controlled by the government. If you personally want to make it something of religion that is your choice, but do not force it upon me or anyone else.
Why would I listen to an organization that helps cover up pedophilia cases anyway?
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Annee
Laws are being enacted right now to change legal forms from "mother" "father" to "parent 1 and parent 2".
This illustrates the madness of this whole approach. The majority have to conform to the whims of the minority.
Originally posted by Annee
Mother/Father are gender bias words. They are not a necessity.
Thanks, that gave me a good laugh.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Annee
NO - - not equal but different.
100% Equal.
In that case, I demand the right (in law) to call myself 'Annee'.
100% equality after all.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Annee
Laws are being enacted right now to change legal forms from "mother" "father" to "parent 1 and parent 2".
When will this PC madness ever end?
"parent 1 and parent 2"? Which is which?
Originally posted by lpowell0627
reply to post by Annee
We have two distinct terms separating the sexual orientation of people:
Heterosexual and homosexual
Then why wouldn't the legal union of these two groups also have two distinct terms?
The legal union of two heterosexual people should be called marriage, as it always has, and the legal union of two homosexual people should be something else.
However, BOTH groups should be afforded the SAME rights.
I don't see anyone fighting to abolish the term homosexual, so why wouldn't't different terms be used to identify the legal union of each group?
Originally posted by lpowell0627
reply to post by Annee
We have two distinct terms separating the sexual orientation of people:
Heterosexual and homosexual
Then why wouldn't the legal union of these two groups also have two distinct terms?
The legal union of two heterosexual people should be called marriage, as it always has, and the legal union of two homosexual people should be something else.
However, BOTH groups should be afforded the SAME rights.
I don't see anyone fighting to abolish the term homosexual, so why wouldn't't different terms be used to identify the legal union of each group?