It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BadBoYeed
does that include the fica social security and medicare they take out of my check too?
edit on 3-3-2012 by BadBoYeed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hawkiye
Nope sorry it would be a disaster... Don't have time to argue do some research.
Originally posted by nunya13
reply to post by Aqualung2012
Short version...a flat national sales ax is inherantly flawed as it adversely affects consumers the less money they make.
The math:
Person A and Person B each purchase a $100 printer
Person a makes $200 a day
Person B makes $100 a day
They each pay $25 intaxes on the printer.
This is 12.5% of person A's income for that day
It is 25% of person B's income for that day
Lower income people also spend a larger portion of their income on taxble sales items, which compounds the problem.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Aqualung2012
A 25% sales tax would not help the economy.. it would help the government. Totally different.
Technically it would hurt the economy, as it would drain far more money out of the economy through taxation away from consumerism (70%+ of our economy) because very few people actually pay more than 25% in Federal Income Tax...
Originally posted by nunya13
reply to post by Aqualung2012
I simply used those numbers to make the my point easier. Should i have based it on buying a lattee? a 25% sales tax would a person making less who buys a $2 latte will pay in sales tax as a portion of their oncome than a person who makes more and also buys the same $2 latte.
By your logic, people should stop buying lattes so they wont be adversely affected by a sales tax, effectively placing the tax burden on higher income earners which brings us to a situation you are trying to avoid.