It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Varemia
reply to post by psikeyhackr
Newtonian physics are outdated because they do not factor in the differences in elastic and inelastic collisions. You should know this if you know even the most basic physics from grade school.
en.wikipedia.org...
The fact that you have security on your computer makes any reliance on black boxes risky. Ultimately they are just electricity converted into a recording.
Hwo long have the 757 and 767 been in production? That is how long they would have had to rig them.
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by psikeyhackr
You are starting to sound like a broken record.
9/11 is a Scientific Farce and our engineering schools have created this problem by not explaining the simple. When has Richard Gage ever brought up the distribution of mass in the towers? I asked him about it in 2008.
Our engineering schools did not create your problem. Your problem is that you don't have enough knowledge about building construction and the physics involved in their destruction.
Originally posted by windsorblue
reply to post by psikeyhackr
I know you have issues with the formula I posted created by Dr Frank Greening on how the towers came down, but what if the first floor to collapse was rubble fell directly onto the supporting restraints when it hit the next floor down, componded with the fact of the weakend structure, would this not still have enough momentum to bring down the rest of the tower?
Originally posted by seagull
It would not overly surprise me if some Americans, too, were involved as a way to foment a war against the "evil that is Islam", or words to that effect... Were high level govt. officials involved?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Anyone who needed lots and lots of stuff to disappear economically, actually. A construction company sent to build a new road through mountains would no longer need heavy machinery, trucks full of dynamite, and armies of lawyers to protect themselves from the lawsuits filed by locals screaming YOUR DEMOLITIONS CRACKED MY FOUNDATION. Five or six of these incredible hush-a-boom explosives laid out in the right place, and BINGO, there's instantly a new road and it's home for bacon and eggs.
Isn't bug spray essentially heavily diluted nerve gas that only affects organisms with simple nervous systems? I thought I had read that somewhere.
The reason for that is because they're still in the experimental stage and aren't economical for civilian use yet. This is literally the same situation with vehicles that ran on natural gas when the technology first came out. Now that the technology is practical, UPS is buying thousands of trucks that run on liquid natural gas.
I think it's safe to say that any prototype hush-a-boom explosives that could silently take down the WTC has proven itself to have been perfected.
James Cameron is a civilian film maker. You've just proved what I said about technology originally created for a military application eventually winding up in the hands of civilians.
This doesn't apply to explosive formulas. Whatever new whiz-bang chemical composition they whipped up, unless the secret ingredient is something rare and exotic like lunar soil or human souls, they can very easily make more of the stuff...and I sincerely doubt the company making the stuff would waste their entire supply of lunar soil or human souls on blowing up the WTC.
None of them has built a model that can completely collapse either. If it was possible then why not just do it?
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Semicollegiate
I am amazed that people think remote controlled airplanes are beyond the capacity of any team of engineers.
Of course R/C is not "beyond the capacity".....it is the full context of facts that precludes R/C being involved on 9/11.
Firstly, there is no doubt of the two Boeing 767s and two Boeing 757s that were involved. But, to allege that they were somehow "retrofitted" to be capably of being remotely controlled?? Now you have to face a few facts.
The very task of the R&D alone to design, and then engineer such an installation is not something done overnight. And, it is not done without a great deal of testing, step-by-step, to work out any "bugs".
Then, even after all of that, there would be the many, many man hours of work needed for the actual conversion...on all four?? This means they would be taken out of service with the airline for that time period, something that could easily be shown to be false....since there is no record of such a thing happening.
Finally.....the glaring fact that there are two of the "black boxes" (Flight Data Recorders) recovered and readable, with information intact. From AAL 77 and UAL 93. These show controls being manipulated in the cockpit in ways that would only be accomplished by Human hand. The sort of things that a "remote controlled" airplane would have non reason to do.
Originally posted by windsorblue
reply to post by Semicollegiate
Whilst I agree that goverments have probably got lots of tech stuff we will never hear about, and remote controlling a plane could even happen...the problem I have with whole goverment behind the attack is the amount of people that would have to be involved in the background, tech & support staff to create the programme, ground staff to fit the system to the aircraft, a remote control pilot for the plane for example...All of the proposed ideas for 9-11 is easy to blame on the goverment, but if you think of what personnel would be needed to carry out the attack,and the planning this would involve for most of the situations the numbers of those involved would be immense, and not one of them thought that mass murder was madness? and not one of them has spoken of what happend to anyone? To me that doesnt seem plausable, but i'm happy for someone to put me right if they know something on this matter.
Good lord my spelling is woeful, long day in the office has turned me into a wreck.edit on 9-3-2012 by windsorblue because: (no reason given)
At this point those planes are missing in action, possibly next to the u-boats and the liberty ships at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.
The only people who need to know are the one guy on the joy stick or computer program and the few mechanics who actually hooked the stuff into the planes.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Semicollegiate
Sigh......
At this point those planes are missing in action, possibly next to the u-boats and the liberty ships at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.
No, the debris from all four was found right where they crashed. Two crashed in NYC, one in DC, and one in Pennsylvania.
The evidence is clear.
I guess when it comes to the wildest thing they never thought of, folks just know everything about it.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Semicollegiate
The reason for the investigation of accidents such as TWA 800 is to determine the cause, since it was unkown and a mystery, until fully studied and re-created.
In the case of the 9/11 airplanes, the cause of their crashes was not in question.
I would bet that most planes are not reassembled after a crash.
Originally posted by Semicollegiate
Just like they use nuclear explosives to excavate reserviors and harbors
There weren't no bug spray till after nerve gas?
You are saying custom built is the same as mass produced.
How do you know his technology came from the military? It might just be really expensive dream list metalurgy. Does every technology from the military wind up in the free market? No nerve gas for sale.