It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Facebook’s moderation rules show company more open to gore than nudity
THE rules Facebook uses to decide whether to censor users’ postings have been published for the first time, detailing its more liberal attitude to gore than to nudity.
A disgruntled former moderator has also told of how Facebook uses outsourced staff in developing countries to moderate the huge volume of material its users upload every day.
A document given to the staff of one third party content moderation firm tells them to delete “any OBVIOUS sexual activity, even if naked parts are hidden from view”. Meanwhile “deep flesh wounds are ok to show; excessive blood is ok to show” and “crushed heads, limbs, etc are ok as long as no insides are showing”.
“Slurs or racial comments of any kind” should be deleted, it says, but “humour overrules hate speech UNLESS slurs are used or humour is not evident”, meaning that comments reported to Facebook as hate speech should remain online if they are judged to be in jest and do not include racial slurs.
A Morocco native who used to make only pennies a day has come clean with what he learned as an indirect-employee of Facebook, Inc.
Amine Derkaoui, 21, says he no longer works with the company that enforced Facebook’s graphic content policy, but he didn’t part ways with the group’s ghastly rulebook that was used to decide what stays on the walls of users and what was deemed worthy of deletion.
Derkaoui claims that his former employer, oDesk, was outsourced by Facebook to moderate comments made by its 800-million-plus users. With that amount of traffic, it takes a lot of work to keep an eye on things. That’s why oDesk hired an army of workers in third-world countries willing to work content control for only $1-per-hour.
“It's humiliating,” he tells Gawker. “They are just exploiting the third world.”
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Why would you call that whining? Would you like to be paid $1.00 a day by a multi-billion dollar company that could pay you a good wage but chooses not to?
Originally posted by FortAnthem
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Why would you call that whining? Would you like to be paid $1.00 a day by a multi-billion dollar company that could pay you a good wage but chooses not to?
I'm just comparing him to what the mods here get paid. They're all volunteers. I bet they would kill for his old slalary.