It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Senate passes bill to block insider trading by officials...

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 04:41 PM
link   
Surprise Surprise!

After all these years,Both Democrats and Republicans have decided to ban insider stock deals.Will it clear the House?


WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate on Thursday overwhelmingly approved a bill that aims to ban insider stock deals among members of Congress, their key staffers and top administration officials.




The 96-3 vote was a huge victory for Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand, one of the bill’s chief sponsors, and Rep. Louise M. Slaughter, who has been pushing a somewhat different version of the so-called “STOCK Act” for six years.



How many have been doing this? Your guess is as good as mine...........


The measure had languished until a November report on CBS’s “60 Minutes” that cast doubt on the propriety of the stock trades of several members of Congress — including House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and the husband of Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. Both have denied wrongdoing.




The kicker?


Nevertheless, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., has vowed to bring a version of the STOCK Act to the House floor sometime this month. He has said the House version of the bill is not broad enough, and has indicated the House may end up voting on a stronger measure that also bans insider land deals.



So,they need a even stronger measure? Ever wonder why those who become Politicians,start up with a little pocket change,and end up millionaires?

Different rules for our beloved politicians,Thats for sure. If Martha Stewart can serve some time,these people should also........

Voted Against the bill.

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM)
Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC)



Senate passes bill to block insider trading by officials

Dissenters,and why.




posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 06:30 PM
link   
Good deal on the surface.

This will be good press for Congress.

I am sure however, that each member has already received the best tax advice on the matter.

Including on how to get around the issue by setting up dummie companies to make the investments using a third party.

Many do that anyway just to keep the heat off their necks.

I bet it passes completely and gets signed in October.



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 06:36 PM
link   
Gotta love the 3 who said "no"....

They must be living in a closet



One of the dissenters was Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM). According to Sen. Bingaman, an amendment by Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) to the STOCK Act would subject 300,000 federal worker to the bill’s 30 day public disclosure reporting requirements for investments. Sen. Richard Shelby’s (R-AL) aides dispute this figure and say the amendment would only apply to 28,000 workers. Still, according to the New Mexico Democrat:

I can’t support a bill that places unreasonable and burdensome reporting requirements on over 300,000 federal workers.





Also voting against the STOCK Act was Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK). Sen. Coburn said his opposition to banning members of Congress from engaging in the kinds of insider trading revealed in Breitbart editor Peter Schweizer’s New York Times bestselling book, Throw Them All Out, and the much-discussed 60 Minutes investigation his book sparked, is that he is not convinced any such instances of insider trading even exist.

The assumption here is that some of our colleagues are doing insider trading on the stock market. Nothing could be further from the truth. The real insider trading is the horse-trading that goes on in this body that is not always in the best interest of the country.

On the floor of the Senate, Sen. Coburn said,

I honestly believe everyone in our body is never going to use insider trading to advantage themselves over the best interests of the country….Nobody in this chamber can name somebody right now who’s trading on inside information.




Sen. Coburn’s comments stand in sharp contrast to Peter Schweizer’s investigations revealing the curious stock trades expertly-timed investment transactions of Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-AL), Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and others.




The third dissenter to the ban on congressional insider trading was Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC). According to Sen. Burr, the STOCK Act “does no more than codify what existing law says. It’s ludicrous.“ Sen. Burr called the legislation “insane,” equated the measure to passing a law requiring citizens to get a driver’s license (which already exists), and called himself and Sen. Tom Coburn “brave” for standing up against the ban.



posted on Feb, 3 2012 @ 07:27 PM
link   
Im am just surprised there wasnt a law on this before!




new topics

top topics
 
5

log in

join