posted on Feb, 6 2012 @ 10:17 AM
Originally posted by Tw0Sides
Sir, I am not a Engineer, Not a pilot , for me to argue those positions would be a weakness to me. I leave those arguements to others, who are more
well versed. I read the post, back and forth and those guys are doing just fine, it is fun to watch you squirm. A guilty Pleasure, if you
I would recommend that you refrain from such false bravado as it does you no credit. You said, and I quote-
"In my debates with Dave, He presents his case very well, to counter his points, I had to do more research, dig deeper, and in doing so, deepen my
resolve that I am on the right side."
You are ADMITTING openly here that you have a resolve to support your conspiracy stories and that you will "do more research and dig deeper" until you
find whatever justification you need that allows you to continue clinging to them. I shouldn't need to point out that this is being intellectually
dishonest of you, as those who have true investigative natures look at both sides of the issue to see which one has the better credibility. If you
wish to have this blind devotion to your conspiracy claims, be my guest, but I would just appreciate it if you would refrain pretending that you are
looking for the truth in the events behind the 9/11 attack, because you're openly admitting you aren't.
Oh, and if you don't believe anything else I say, then at least believe this- I never "squirm", since I'm not pushing for the OS (as you call it).
All I really do is post the facts and let them stand or fall on their own merits. It's lies, and never the truth, that needs to fear criticism, as
Patrick Henry once said, which is a fact that April Gallop and her lawyers just found out the hard way.
Do I take it that you subscribe to her "no plane hit the Pentagon" delusion? That IS the topic of this thread, after all.
No I prefer to look into events that happened before any planes took off on Sept 11.
The months before the attack. There is more evidence of a conspiracy there than any of the events from 911 forward.
All right, so when we hear that German intelligence reported that Mohammed Atta was in contact with Al Qaida oepratives while in Hamburg, does the
evidence show you that it was a terrorist attack and that Al Qaida did in fact have a hand in it, or does the evidence show you that the German gov't
took part of the "sinister secret plot to take over the world"?
To ME, it tells me that you don't bother to listen to anything that doesn't conform to what you yourself want to believe and you probably didn't even
know Mohammed Atta was in contact with Al Qaida operatives while in Hamburg. Am I wrong?
edit on 6-2-2012 by GoodOlDave because: (no reason given)