Hackers outwit online banking identity security systems, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 2-2-2012 @ 12:11 PM by SloAnPainful

Hackers outwit online banking identity security systems


www.bbc.co.uk
Criminal hackers have found a way round the latest generation of online banking security devices given out by banks, the BBC has learned.

After logging in to the bank's real site, account holders are being tricked by the offer of training in a new "upgraded security system".

Money is then moved out of the account but this is hidden from the user.

(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 2-2-2012 @ 12:20 PM by AuranVector
Originally posted by SloAnPainful

Hackers outwit online banking identity security systems


www.bbc.co.uk
Criminal hackers have found a way round the latest generation of online banking security devices given out by banks, the BBC has learned.

After logging in to the bank's real site, account holders are being tricked by the offer of training in a new "upgraded security system".

Money is then moved out of the account but this is hidden from the user.

(visit the link for the full news article)



Thanks, SloAnPainful, for the heads-up. It's good to be alerted. I have ID theft protection, etc. and I still have nightmares about this stuff. I hate using online banking -- just for this reason. You know there are hackers who can find a way to hack into anything.

It's gotten to the point where I hate to use my cards for anything. I stopped using my debit card altogether.
Ever since I had my PayPal account hacked into, I hate online shopping.



reply posted on 2-2-2012 @ 12:29 PM by SloAnPainful
reply to post by AuranVector



Thanks AuranVector!

Yeah I agree. In America most people do a lot of online shopping. Hackers know where and who to target. People think that these are 13 year old kinds with computer knowledge, which may be true, but they are not dumb kids. They are skilled and they can get your information even if you think you are protected. My advice, having a I.T degree, do not use free anti-virus software, pay for it. It will give you a better piece of mind.

Someone should invet a software just for banks. That is a heavy target for criminal hackers. It is easy for them to get thousands quickly, and before you and the bank is even aware of it. One second you check your balance and it's all good, the next day BOOM gone. Just a heads up, keep yourself secure.

A rule for the internet and scams. If it seems to good to be true it normally is..

-SAP-


reply posted on 2-2-2012 @ 12:31 PM by tothetenthpower
reply to post by SloAnPainful



Lol.

Well at least all banks are insured against these problems. So you're ok, they'll refund the money stolen as soon as they can prove it was part of this particular scam.

Just more fuel for them to take away the internet though.

~Tenth


reply posted on 2-2-2012 @ 12:34 PM by SloAnPainful
reply to post by tothetenthpower



Yeah its more of a inconvience and a hassel.

However the probelm still is that these criminal hackers are still getting paid and not getting caught. Which basically means they can up their arsenal or tech.

It is still a big headache for the people involved or corporations involved.

-SAP-
edit on 2-2-2012 by SloAnPainful because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 2-2-2012 @ 01:32 PM by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by SloAnPainful
My advice, having a I.T degree, do not use free anti-virus software, pay for it. It will give you a better piece of mind.
The paid antivirus programs have the same problem, they can't stop a threat until they know about it.

Want good advice? Stop the threat before the antivirus company even knows about it.

Stop letting scripts run in your browser, with rare exceptions on a whitelist of sites that you completely trust. If you do that and you're careful about not opening untrusted e-mail attachments, an anti-virus is superfluous. I know plenty of people who don't even run an anti-virus at all and never get infected, but they are all technically savvy. People who aren't probably still need to run an antivirus but if you think that paying for one means it can stop threats before they know about them, the article attached to the OP correctly indicates otherwise..

one security company did privately concede that, if this threat had come from a source not known to be bad and started communicating with a web address also not on the black-list of "bad" sites - until they had discovered and analysed it - it probably would have beaten their protection.
This is why I configure my own security. This whole idea of having a "blacklist" of "bad" sites is part of the problem.

My security assumes all sites are "bad" unless I specifically whitelist a site, and would not permit such communication. The idea of blacklisting "bad" sites is a security approach that has more holes in it than swiss cheese and this article provides a perfect example of why this is so.


reply posted on 2-2-2012 @ 01:38 PM by SloAnPainful
reply to post by Arbitrageur



Very true and good advice. Not everyone is a computer "whizz" though and can format their own security.

-SAP-
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Iranian sailors chase off pirates attacking U.S. ship
  Posted 5 days ago with 95 member flags
BBC Caught In Syria Massacre Propaganda Hoax
  Posted 1 days ago with 74 member flags
Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban
  Posted 9 days ago with 73 member flags
Man Loses $22,000 In New \'Policing For Profit\' Case
  Posted 7 days ago with 63 member flags
Bin Laden died of natural causes: Former CIA agent
  Posted 9 days ago with 58 member flags