It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
I have an old Betty Crocker cookbook from the 50's.
Everything is cups of sugar and pounds of straight lard.
Yet where was obesity then? Where were all the fat kids?
Originally posted by Binder
Originally posted by BBalazs
FACT: The human body doesn't need SUGAR. It makes its own. Thank you!
FACT 2: SUGAR rich foods contain very low nutritional value.
FACT 3: SUGARY foods are enzyme poor, making the body unable to process is well.
FACT 4: SUGARY foods, when processed convert mainly to fat, taking along any LOVE aka added chemicals with them, and storing it. To be used another day, or perhaps poisoning YOU!
FACT 5: If it look, smells, and behaves like poison, it IS most likely poison.
As for regulation, not sure.
But I dare anyone to challenge those FACTS.edit on 2-2-2012 by BBalazs because: (no reason given)
Challenge Accepted:
FACT 1: Every system of the body can survive without glucose(the eventual metabolic product of the breakdown of carbohydrates, and "sugar") by the body's production of ketone bodies from protein catabolism. Every system except the CNS(brain). The brain runs on glucose, and their is no substitute. If you consume absolutely no sugar ever you will slip into a coma, and die. It doesn't ake much, but you must consume some. (about 20-30 grams a day.)
WRONG!!!!!!!! your body produces its OWN sugar from carbs, proteins and fat. NO NEED for extra SUGAR.
FACT 2: The sugar content of food has no bearing on its nutrient density. Yes soda has no nutritional value, and is very high in sugar content, but fruit also has a high frucose(sugar) content, but is fairly nutrient dense.
TECHNICALITY. In the context of the article I was referring processed SUGARY foods, but fair point. Also, fruits IS NOT A SUGAR. Its called fruit. Now we can get back to nitpicking about complex carbohydrates, but the fact remains: We do not NEED SUGAR in and of itself. We do NOT NEED dead foods.I mean our bodies. If you are going to argue that complex carbohydrates (and others) are broken into sugar, I will not argue, you have made my point. Sure they are, thats why we do not need extra SUGAR in and of itself. The case of the fruit is fare point, but we also don't need FRUITS. FRUIT, you got me, but still fruit contains NUTRIENTS essential to its digestion, and enyzmes.What do other sugary, processed junk food got? Nada. But, again fair point. I will amend: SUGARY PROCESSED FOODS HAVE LITTLE NUTRITIONAL VALUE.
FACT 3: Refer back to fact #2. Sugars are used to create ATP to make energy to make enzymes during anabolism.
REFER BACK TO 1, SUGAR is MADE by your body from carbs, proteins and fat, no need for extra stuff. NO biological NEED.
FACT4: Sugary foods convert mostly to GLUCOSE, which causes an insulin spike which causes storage, and use of the faster metabolizing glucose first, and storage of all the other stuff. (proteins, and fats, which are slower, and take more energy to metabolize.)
Exactly. So on this we agree. As we have no NEED for this stuff, and it nutritionally valueless, it just gets stored along with the love.
FACT 5: Then you must never ingest anything into your body ever again! Everything is a poison at the correct dose, and route of administration. If you drink too much water it will kill you.
Water is NOT TOXIC. That is a lame argument, I am sure you know that. So I am not going to challenge it. Anyway WE ARE TALKING ABOUT SUGAR!
As for below, I said I am against REGULATION.
TRY AGAIN?
As for regulation. HELL NO! We are on the slippery slope with this BS already. 15 years ago when they started in on smokers we all joked that someday they would regulate everything, air, sunlight, and water. Today it isn't a joke anymore. They are seriously looking at doing just that! Sugar is the most basic nutrient your body needs. We crave it because we are hardwired in our primitive brain to do so. Concentrated sugar used to be an extreme rarity in our available food sources, so we are wired to seek it out, and consume it whenever available. In our modern world it is simply easily available, but our wiring hasn't caught up yet. Yes, we over consume, but having the government step in to regulate it is a TERRIBLE idea. If your physicaI output is enough you can eat a lot of sugar because it is fast easily available energy source. If you are sedentary you can't eat as much without storing the other stuff. But you cannot live without it. I would rather deal with the consequences of too much freedom, than the tyranny of none. Now hand me that ice cream, and leave me alone.
Originally posted by skitzspiricy
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
I would imagine, out getting exercise in the fresh air everyday and not sitting at home on their games consoles eating fake junk foods on a daily basis.
edit on 2-2-2012 by skitzspiricy because: (no reason given)
Sugarcane isn't real food?
Originally posted by BBalazs
reply to post by Garfee
sugarcane is a real food...not that we have a need for it.
Originally posted by Garfee
Originally posted by BBalazs
reply to post by Garfee
sugarcane is a real food...not that we have a need for it.
What foods do we have a need for? I'm not trying to be argumentative for the sake of it, I'm genuinely curious as to why we should not be allowed to enjoy our food.
I don't care that cheesecake has very little nutritional value - it's amazing and I love it. All I have to do is stop myself from eating the whole thing and repeating the process the following day, for it to be of little to no harm for my body.
If some people cannot control their appetites and shovel too much food into their fat pie holes, scoffing everything and anything in front of them, I should not be penalised one of the small pleasure in life which is still yet to be completely regulated.
No, you shouldn't. I am NOT for regulation!
I am for education, that more people are aware of HOW nutrition works.
It is an ugly subject.
It is a subject that is linked with obesity and autoimmune diseases, cancer, and fatigue.
The problem is that these problems become apparent only decades latter.
Anyone may choose what they eat.
However, where problems highlighted, the companies themselves may change to provide for healthier alternatives.
The fact remains there is no biological need for sugar in and of itself.
Let me quote myself:
your body creates all the sugar it needs from carbs, protein and fat.
from REAL food.
NO need for the extra stuff.
It is just a ploy.
A gimmick.
An addiction.
Our food supply is contaminated.
Think not any more of sugar, just eat veggies, meat, raw milk, eggs, nuts, leaves, even aged cheese, etc.
Whole, intact foods.
Nutrient rich.
As god or the universe intended.
You will never NEED sugar again.
Your body will spot you.
And your mind will work fine.
In fact better then ever.
At some point in your life, you may consider a review of what you eat, for the sake of better health tomorrow.
Off course sugar is appetizing.
The problems start with the processing.
Our bodies are not built to handle this.
It is a fair point. And a message that should be spread.
Albeit, even in this day, very educated people are very attached to their diet.
Point out how physics work, they will understand.
Point out what a healthy diet is and they will become defensive.
If you are really interested in the subject, I can recommend books.
Do not take anything I say )or the books) at face value....Research all the research that is quoted, making sure it is not misrepresented.
I havent eaten sugar for years. Or salt.
I am so healthy and full of energy, that I only sleep 5 hours a day. Thats just a personal story, no need to make any assumptions on that. JUst saying, that if you perhaps try to eat what our body is supposed to eat, for a week, you may change your mind.
And no, I am not the one saying what to eat. It is laid down in 2ooooo years of evolution.
In fact don't even look at what we ate, look at what we didn't EAT.
And no this is not a pale rant, those people will soon die of heart disease and such but they do make some fine points.edit on 2-2-2012 by BBalazs because: (no reason given)
reply to post by BBalazs
And no this is not a pale rant, those people will soon die of heart disease and such but thez do make some fine points.
Originally posted by BBalazs
FACT: The human body doesn't need SUGAR. It makes its own. Thank you!