It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Mitt Romney’s $21.6 million of income in 2010 included profits from elite funds run by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Golden Gate Capital Corp...
Individuals usually need to meet a net worth threshold of at least $5 million to qualify as an investor...
The net worth of the 64-year-old Romney is between $190 million and $250 million, according to an estimate from his campaign. His tax rate in 2010 was 13.9 percent, reflecting the preferential treatment...
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
But how do you only pay 12% income tax?
That's the question is it not?
How is that possible?
That is the first thing needed to be defined in this thread
Anyone making over 1M should be paying at least 29% in federal taxes alone, I only mean federal here
So how do individuals do it?
news.yahoo.com...
Anyone?edit on 24-1-2012 by ModernAcademia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jordan River
The cut is probably because he is owned by the federal reserve (rothschild) gave em the cut
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by Jordan River
The cut is probably because he is owned by the federal reserve (rothschild) gave em the cut
FED causes inflation which is basically a tax
But the FED has no influence directly with actual taxes
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Druid42
So y'all are now in favour of socialist taxes on income??
this should be good....
Originally posted by randomname
the argument can be made that he payed more than in taxes in one year than most people will make in a lifetime.
saying that, people like romney should take up the slack for people not taking in as much.
people making under 30k a year should have no income tax. people in that income tax spend all their money on mortgages, food, electricity etc. which are taxed.
the government will still get revenue, but the financial burden will be alleviated.
Originally posted by tsawyer2
Originally posted by randomname
the argument can be made that he payed more than in taxes in one year than most people will make in a lifetime.
saying that, people like romney should take up the slack for people not taking in as much.
people making under 30k a year should have no income tax. people in that income tax spend all their money on mortgages, food, electricity etc. which are taxed.
the government will still get revenue, but the financial burden will be alleviated.
People making less than 30K a year get most if not all of their withheld income tax back every year.....those are the 47 percent who pay no taxes....
sales taxes yes, and property if they own it, but not income tax....
They pay nothing on income....
and personally, I think they should.
edit on 24-1-2012 by tsawyer2 because: (no reason given)edit on 24-1-2012 by tsawyer2 because: added "withheld"
Originally posted by YouAreLiedTo
Originally posted by tsawyer2
Originally posted by randomname
the argument can be made that he payed more than in taxes in one year than most people will make in a lifetime.
saying that, people like romney should take up the slack for people not taking in as much.
people making under 30k a year should have no income tax. people in that income tax spend all their money on mortgages, food, electricity etc. which are taxed.
the government will still get revenue, but the financial burden will be alleviated.
People making less than 30K a year get most if not all of their withheld income tax back every year.....those are the 47 percent who pay no taxes....
sales taxes yes, and property if they own it, but not income tax....
They pay nothing on income....
and personally, I think they should.
edit on 24-1-2012 by tsawyer2 because: (no reason given)edit on 24-1-2012 by tsawyer2 because: added "withheld"
What you are failing to see in that aspect is that when they take those income taxes in January 2010, they are worth less when you get those dollars back in 2011.
Even if you get 100% of your income taxes back at the end of the year, due to inflation, it's still worth less than when they took it from you.