It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SavedOne
I am not saying the conspiracy is or is not true, but as an architect I feel a need to set the record straight whenever I see someone imply that all architects and engineers back the conspiracy. The vast majority do not.
Three days? You were lucky...
Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to post by ProudBird
There are dozens of witnesses who have reported hearing explosions. That's enough to convince me that explosions were heard, and this coincides with all of the other characteristics of the buildings collapses that match up with a controlled demolition.
If you want witnesses reporting explosions on all four sides, look it up yourself dude.
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by PrinceDreamer
Which Bush family member was Chief of Security leaving post on 10th Sept, day before attack ?
Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Burns also served. [Utne][/ex
Source
Originally posted by PrinceDreamer
S&F for you for this post, a lot of work went into it, putting it altogether
....as I watched the towers collapse I knew there was something wrong the collapses were too uniform to straight down....
I think that although this gives the evidence as to "how" the deed was done, there are other things that need to be considered, such as "who" and most importantly "why"....
Originally posted by PrinceDreamer
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by PrinceDreamer
Which Bush family member was Chief of Security leaving post on 10th Sept, day before attack ?
Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Burns also served. [Utne][/ex
Source
Marvin Bush was a director of Securacom, which did do some security work for the WTC, but he ceased to be a director in June 2000. He was never "Chief of Security" at the WTC at any time, let alone 10 Sept 2001. The Head of Security at that time was John O'Neil, who died in the attack :-
conspiracies.skepticproject.com...
These myths just grow and grow.
Originally posted by Darkwing01
reply to post by Alfie1
I can't believe it took me so long to cotton on to the hash-a-boom explosions thing...
The argument runs like this:
Q) If there were explosions why did nobody hear it?
A) Lots of people reported hearing explosions.
Which is rebutted by:
"Ah! Lots of things cause loud noises, not just explosions, therefore the loud noises heard were not explosions after all."
Anybody wanna play spot-the-fallacy?
Originally posted by Darkwing01
reply to post by Alfie1
I can't believe it took me so long to cotton on to the hash-a-boom explosions thing...
The argument runs like this:
Q) If there were explosions why did nobody hear it?
A) Lots of people reported hearing explosions.
Which is rebutted by:
"Ah! Lots of things cause loud noises, not just explosions, therefore the loud noises heard were not explosions after all."
Anybody wanna play spot-the-fallacy?
Originally posted by R_Clark
reply to post by pteridine
Possibly the least logical answer ever. It is an investigator's job to go down every avenue to find out what the actual cause is. Disproving the author's idea is not relevant to the physical evidence which the author shows. Further, you talk about physics and laws.. Newtonian possibly. Quantum mechanics allows for many of the physical events portrayed by the author. Dr. Judy Wood has done the most comprehensive forensic analysis. Check it out. Also, all of your conclusions only work in a world where the speed of light is constant.. I guess the most recent papers from Cern stating the speed of light might not be constant does not help your argument.