It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nineix
I thought, according to the Effected Multiverse idea, that any time, anyone, anywhere, made a decision, or even any place where random chance takes place, another universe is created to follow the course of every decision, and every random chance.
In this universe, Bob decides to turn left. In the next he decided to go right. In another he goes straight. In still another he backs up. In another he sits there. In others he does these after pausing. In still others he stayed home, or Bob might have gotten an X chromosome instead of a Y and is a Sue, or doesn't exist at all.
Results and results of results are being effected, or chosen are occurring an infinite number of times, in an infinite number of cause and effectualities, splitting the 'timeline' an infinite number of times every attosecond of every day of all existence of every universe for all of time.
So, one event where time is split is absolutely nothing.
In one of the universes next door, I never wrote this. In another, I wrote it backwards just to be annoying. In another, I was extremely rude. In another my response supported you. In this one, well, in this time line, well, you should get the point by now.
Originally posted by CrimsonNova
Its articles like these that will assist in the awakening of humanity, keep up the great work! We must be diligent in our efforts as we will be the shepherds of a dazed and confused populace in the near future.
I also follow Georgi Stankov and participate in the many deep esoteric discussions that he hosts at his site, and I believe he is bar none the most intelligent and determined lightworker in the whole community.
It is also important to note that he has discovered the Universal Law of Nature, it is greatly detailed here: link Upon its discovery he created the Universal Equation which answered the many questions of physics that lack the ability to explain the way the universe truly works. That equation is in its entirety here: equation
Before this thread gets derailed by ignoramuses that have no concept of spirituality or the times we are in, I encourage anyone that wishes to learn more about the lightworker community to check this website out: Spirit Science
It is a amazing resource for newcomers interested in gaining great insights to themselves and the world of spirituality.
Namaste
Originally posted by nineix
I thought, according to the Effected Multiverse idea, that any time, anyone, anywhere, made a decision, or even any place where random chance takes place, another universe is created to follow the course of every decision, and every random chance.
In this universe, Bob decides to turn left. In the next he decided to go right. In another he goes straight. In still another he backs up. In another he sits there. In others he does these after pausing. In still others he stayed home, or Bob might have gotten an X chromosome instead of a Y and is a Sue, or doesn't exist at all.
Results and results of results are being effected, or chosen are occurring an infinite number of times, in an infinite number of cause and effectualities, splitting the 'timeline' an infinite number of times every attosecond of every day of all existence of every universe for all of time.
So, one event where time is split is absolutely nothing.
In one of the universes next door, I never wrote this. In another, I wrote it backwards just to be annoying. In another, I was extremely rude. In another my response supported you. In this one, well, in this time line, well, you should get the point by now.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by princeguy
And what findings are those? It was his Universal Law and Universal Equation that led him to make those previous predictions. Everything he says is based off of that and a single "channeler." So, if he has been wrong on every account in the past it means his methodology is flawed.
Originally posted by Sundowner
Here is what I'm confused about: This article is all very well and nice, but I don't actually see any "quanative" proof here, for instance, like the pole shift/reversal thing...Is there conclusive evidence for this? I've seen facts pointing both ways. It's hard to clearly see how is right/wrong in this. =(