It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by onewithall
Hello ATS!
This is my first thread (besides my intro), I did a search and couldn't find this on here yet (if it is, I apologize).
Anyway, I just found this video on a random blog. It shows footage taken by the Apollo 11 astronauts from inside the spacecraft as they film different shots of "Earth" from a window. Well, they're actually in space, but they aren't as far away from the Earth as they say. Watch the video, there is great narration. Very interesting stuff, indeed.
So what do you guys think? This is the first video I've ever seen that makes me believe some of the moon landing hoax conspiracies.
much love,
OnewithAlledit on 10-1-2012 by onewithall because: changed the title
Originally posted by captainpudding
reply to post by BrandonD
What would you say are the questionable aspects of the missions? From what i've seen they've all be pretty straightforward. Go to moon, beat Russians, everybody cheers.
Originally posted by Gibborium
reply to post by BrandonD
Your example of a girl friend is full of circumstantial evidence where the "Space Race" and the Moon landings are based on empirical evidence.
Originally posted by BrandonD
Think whatever you like. There are christians who consider their beliefs to be based in science.
Words do not equal reality. If one can grasp even a fragment of the significance of that statement, then they can understand what I mean.edit on 30-1-2013 by BrandonD because: grammatical
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
The evidence is simple scientifc fact...
You need to educate yourself about the Van Allen belts...
The radiation level in some of the Van Allen belts regularly reaches 2000 REM, or more!!!
Not only that, but the belts can be thousands of miles deep. At Earth Escape Velocity it would take a spacecraft 2 hours to pass through the most deadly zone.
It is simply not possible to build a rocket with sufficient power to lift a heavily shielded spacecraft into Orbit, let alone to the Moon.
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
The evidence is simple scientifc fact...You need to educate yourself about the Van Allen belts and how they operate in a similar way to the magnatron in a microwave oven.
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." -- Dr. James Van Allen
Originally posted by captainpudding
reply to post by ProfessorAlfB
You quite literally just did. Please elaborate on what non-radiation problem you're talking about?
Originally posted by Gibborium
reply to post by BrandonD
Your example of a girl friend is full of circumstantial evidence where the "Space Race" and the Moon landings are based on empirical evidence.
The science is valid. The equipment was manufactured. The astronauts were thoroughly trained. The rockets went up.
The CM and LM with the astronauts went to the Moon and landed and then took off and returned to Earth safely..
The data for all this is recorded and has been archived through transcribed data tapes, photo and movie film record.
audio recordings, live continuous recorded TV broadcasts.
, eye witness testimony of professional and amateur observers.
budget allocations
spending records
, vendors and contract companies that produced everything from food to sanitary devices to nuts and bolts to fuel, to . . . almost infinity. It all combines together to prove that the Moon landings did happen.
Open your mind and do the science. It is provable and repeatable (in fact it was repeated over and over).
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
The evidence is simple scientifc fact...You need to educate yourself about the Van Allen belts and how they operate in a similar way to the magnatron in a microwave oven.
You need to dig a bit deeper!!!
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." -- Dr. James Van Allen
Do you want to educate him after all the belts are named after him
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
The evidence is simple scientifc fact...You need to educate yourself about the Van Allen belts and how they operate in a similar way to the magnatron in a microwave oven.
You need to dig a bit deeper!!!
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." -- Dr. James Van Allen
Do you want to educate him after all the belts are named after him
And how do you know he wasn't paid to say that by NASA? Never underestimate the power of money to hide the truth.
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
Photo and film records that have been proved to be faked!
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
The evidence is simple scientifc fact...
And yet not a single scientist anywhere around the world for over the past 40 years has had any issue with the Apollo missions and radiation.
Because, like you they are very gullible and have swallowed the hoax as fact, hook, line and sinker!
You need to educate yourself about the Van Allen belts...
And you need to educate yourself on how much radiation the astronauts were really exposed to.
The radiation level in some of the Van Allen belts regularly reaches 2000 REM, or more!!!
Not only that, but the belts can be thousands of miles deep. At Earth Escape Velocity it would take a spacecraft 2 hours to pass through the most deadly zone.
I guess it's a good thing they didn't go through the densest parts...
It is simply not possible to build a rocket with sufficient power to lift a heavily shielded spacecraft into Orbit, let alone to the Moon.
I guess it's a good thing you don't need lead to minimize one's exposure to the type of radiation they encountered. In fact lead could do more harm than good. Look up "Bremsstrahlung".
You still have not provided any evidence against the Apollo missions. You've just told me that radiation is bad in space. And yes, depending on what's happening, the radiation levels can get bad, but they are always changing. It's not like the Sun is blasting out CME's every 5 minutes.
No, but on average there are 3 CME's every day so its not as if they only happen once a year!
Have you ever looked up how much and what type of radiation the Apollo astronauts actually had to deal with? What types of shielding they used? etc...
Of course I have...I have been researching this stuff for decades.
Might I suggest some reading material for you:
www.clavius.org...
www.clavius.org...
Thanks, they back up what I have been saying. Here is an enlightening link for you to read...Particularly take note what Francis Cucinotta, NASA's radiation health officer at the Johnson Space Center has to say.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by ProfessorAlfB
Photo and film records that have been proved to be faked!
Well since photography has been a hobby of mine for a long long time care to show me what your proof is!!!
Have a look at this video which will educate you on where to see the proof of a hoax in NASA photos: