2012: a new begining for Humanity after the end of the present long Cosmic Cycle

reply to post by The angel of light


The following information has been extracted from the page of Ron Paul in wikipedia:

From Wikipedia,
In June, a group of 132 supporters of Paul, demanding the freedom as delegates to the upcoming Republican party national convention to cast votes for Paul, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court against the Republican National Committee and 55 state and territorial Republican party organizations for allegedly coercing delegates to choose Mitt Romney as the party’s presidential nominee.[106] The suit alleged that there had been “a systematic campaign of election fraud at state conventions,” employing rigging of voting machines, ballot stuffing, and falsification of ballot totals. The suit further pointed to incidents at state conventions, including acts of violence and changes in procedural rules, allegedly intended to deny participation of Paul supporters in the party decision-making and to prevent votes from being cast for Paul. An attorney representing the complainants said that Paul campaign advisor Doug Wead had voiced support for the legal action.[106] Paul himself told CNN that although the lawsuit was not a part of his campaign’s strategy and that he had not been advising his supporters to sue, he was not going to tell his supporters not to sue, if they had a legitimate argument. “If they’re not following the rules, you have a right to stand up for the rules. I think for the most part these winning caucuses that we've been involved in we have followed the rules. And the other side has at times not followed the rules.”[107]

Paul declined to speak at the Republican National Convention as a matter of principle, saying that the convention planners had demanded that his remarks be vetted by the Romney campaign and that he make an unqualified endorsement of Romney.[108] Paul had felt that "It wouldn’t be my speech.... That would undo everything I’ve done in the last 30 years. I don’t fully endorse him for president.”[108] Many of Paul's supporters and delegates walked out of the convention in protest over rules adopted by the convention that reduced their delegate count and that would make it harder for non-establishment candidates to win the party's nomination in future elections.[109] Supporters and media commentators had noted that the delegations from states where Paul had had the most support were given the worst seats in the convention hall, while delegations from regions with no electoral votes, such as the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and Puerto Rico, were given prime seats at the front.[110][111]

Paul ultimately refused to endorse the Romney–Ryan ticket selected by the Republican Party. He said that there was no essential difference between Romney and his Democratic opponent, Obama, on the most critical policies: "I’ve been in this business a long time and believe me there is essentially no difference from one administration to another no matter what the platforms.... The foreign policy stays the same, the monetary policy stays the same, there’s no proposal for any real cuts and both parties support it."[112

It is very clear that what Dr. Ron Paul has done along many months is a typical case of disidence in a Political party, and that he was not only competing against Romney for the Nomination, but he called republican delegates to don't vote Romney in the convention and refuse at all to endorse his campaign after it.

We have seen in this 2012 a case of disobedience in a Party headed by a figure that has been his entire life in that party, and that also refused to endorse McCain in 2008.

Nothing can be more clear to determine that there is at present a third voice in America that is neither aligned with the Democratics neither with the official leadership of the GOP.

Now, if that was not enough, Ron Paul has also leaded a claim that secession is an American principle, something that has created a great distance from him to the core of the GOP. He remains as republican only of name but not of heart, since Secession is a absolutely unacceptable in a Party that defended the Union around Abraham Lincoln in the XIX century:

www.slate.com...


Thanks for your attention,

The Angel of Lightness