It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
One simple question, if we are indeed too complex to be the result of 4 1/2 billion years of evolution... Who programmed the programmer? If we are too complex, then the entity that 'created' us must be infinitely more complex, and thus, by your logic, would also require a 'programmer'. That programmer would also require an infinitely more complex programmer, and so on, and so on...
We have yet to invent a computer that is more complex than our brains, but we have already digitized the entire human genome, thus your premise is flawed... While it is complex, it is not that complex, and it is also not the most complex DNA on the planet, the highest being the Aquatic Rat, and the Crab Eating Rat amongst the mammalian population. Source.
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by westcoast
So you agree that if there was a 'programmer', that there would a 'programmer' who programmed the 'programmer'???
Originally posted by novastrike81
Originally posted by JaxonRoberts
One simple question, if we are indeed too complex to be the result of 4 1/2 billion years of evolution... Who programmed the programmer? If we are too complex, then the entity that 'created' us must be infinitely more complex, and thus, by your logic, would also require a 'programmer'. That programmer would also require an infinitely more complex programmer, and so on, and so on...
We have yet to invent a computer that is more complex than our brains, but we have already digitized the entire human genome, thus your premise is flawed... While it is complex, it is not that complex, and it is also not the most complex DNA on the planet, the highest being the Aquatic Rat, and the Crab Eating Rat amongst the mammalian population. Source.
Well said, unfortunately you know the answer that is coming. You know this answer is going to make no sense, because the answer is illogical.
Originally posted by ypperst
reply to post by westcoast
To be honest, I have had that thought too
Its an interesting and also - sometimes - easier to understand how it all works on that way.
But then again, the master who made us, where did that being come from?
Is that being, the only, real being?
and everything else is just 'data'?