The Role of Labor Unions in the NWO

reply to post by woodwardjnr


Corporate money is not that influential is it is just money and does not provide a good or service.

Unions for the most part are industry for goods and services, thus, that is where I made my connection to the Unions and the elite. The Elite need goods and services and thats why they need unions.

Without them, the game is over.

reply to post by LongbottomLeaf

It started out that way and ended that way what am I missing? I dont fear tomorrow or unions Im just not making the connection between unions and nwo slaves. Socialist and the elites are 2 different things

Actually Rockefeller and Rothschild's are both socialists. The point is that the elite recognize that they can not realize their own pipe dream utopia without someone to provide goods and services. The unions provide goods and services of many types, in fact they target corporations or companies for the goods and services they lack. In return for the goods and services, union members are payed healthy dues, sucking the money from the government tit so to speak. The Unions don't mind because they collect dues and elect a democratic union supporting President like say Obama, who is in bed with the Unions and so its win win.

Accept in the end its the union workers who get screwed along with everybody else. The elite are well taken care of, but they eliminate those who threaten their power.

Unions, the people don't actually need them. The elite do.

It's a battle for hearts and minds and people have fallen for it time and time again throughout history.

In any society you need to win the hearts and minds of people to gain power. The union leaders do this by winning the hearts and minds of the workers, by getting them fat salaries and benefits. The political leaders win the hearts and minds of union leaders using the same method and tapping into that good old supply of government tax payer money.

reply to post by thehoneycomb


To be brutally honest, I really don't care. I'm not afraid of a story supported only by speculations.

reply to post by thehoneycomb

Also this being the end result. I seriously find it hard to believe Rockefeller wasn't involved. But I digress, what operations did Rockefeller and his clan take part in the attacks?

Same here. Although I can't tell you how exactly Rockefeller was involved, it's dificult to imagine the governor of Colorado acting unilaterally without consulting Rockefeller on the matter.

Keep in mind that the coal mine was riddled with labour spies. Hard to believe Rockefeller could have been out of the loop at any point. Two years later, the National Guard shot 3 Standard Oil (NJ) strikers to death - I sense a pattern.

Violence seems to be a commonality among union members of all kinds. Violence and intimidation.

On the flip side of the coin we have the Mohawk Valley formula which calls for agitators. I'm not saying union workers are incapable of violence by themselves, but how many of these people are actually labour spies or paid agitators?

So far, you've tried to establish a possible motive for elite support of labour unions, but you are yet to provide any evidence in support of your theory. No other posters have yet been able to see any connections either. Do you have any facts/stats to support your contention that unions destroy the middle class? Any direct evidence of the elite class supporting labour unions?

IMO, union organizers and capitalists were and remain natural enemies.

This might be helpful:
Timeline of labor issues and events

The point is that the elite recognize that they can not realize their own pipe dream utopia without someone to provide goods and services. The unions provide goods and services of many types, in fact they target corporations or companies for the goods and services they lack. In return for the goods and services, union members are payed healthy dues, sucking the money from the government tit so to speak. The Unions don't mind because they collect dues and elect a democratic union supporting President like say Obama, who is in bed with the Unions and so its win win.

To me, this paragraph is completely nonsensical. I really can't comprehend what you are trying to say here.

Why would the elite class care about raising the middle class' standard of living? Did they do anything to banish slavery or serfdom? To the contrary, they fought tooth and nail to keep both of these institutions. Traditionally, the elite class' strategy has been to pit the middle class against the lower class.

I really can't see how unions suck any money from government coffers in the context you've provided above. Can you expand on that?

reply to post by ConspiracyNut23


I know that in my field, which is motion graphics, video and design. Jobs are hard to come by. Problem is that the Unions in this case have swallowed up most of the good jobs, in my area anyways. Some of these guys have been employed since the 60's and there is no turnover. Problem is there is no competition, when these people are basically guaranteed not to get fired they can F# off and not even be qualified in some cases while they make money hand over fist.

In the government sector, most jobs have also become unionized. Even TSA and most of the Airline Business all union.

Anyways, my personal situation aside. Follow the money. Bailout money went to bailout unions.

www.foxbusiness.com...

www.sodahead.com... 59/

money.cnn.com...

Well anyways, historically speaking, their was that whole Bolshevik thing, That Nazi Germany thing and the Communist China thing.

Heavily Unionized, lead to the holocaust and millions dead.

Bolshevik
www.marxists.org...
en.wikipedia.org...(Bolshevik)

Nazi Germany
en.wikipedia.org...'_Party
fcit.usf.edu...
avalon.law.yale.edu...

Communist China
factsanddetails.com...

Anyhow, my only point is the people don't need unions, the elite do.