ZeroHedge cited from
Gonzalo Lira
Nine weeks after its bankruptcy, the general public still hasn’t quite realized the implications of the MF Global scandal.
My own sense is, this is the first tremor of the earthquake that’s coming to the global financial system. And how the central banks and
financial regulators treated the “Systemically Important Financial Institutions” that had exposure to MF Global—to the detriment of the
ordinary, blameless customer who got royally ripped off in its bankruptcy—is both the template of how the next financial crisis will be handled,
and an accelerator that will make the next crisis happen that much sooner.
Next section discusses what happened to MF Global and how poorly the bankruptcy was managed, including customer money being stolen in the process.
Now, what does this mean?
It means that nobody’s money is safe. It means that regulators care more about protecting the so-called “Systemically Important Financial
Institutions” than about protecting Ordinary Joe investors.It means that, when crunchtime comes, central banks and government regulators will
allow SIFI’s to get better, and let the Ordinary Joes get #ed.
So far, so evil—but here comes the really troubling part: It is an open secret that there are more paper-assets than there are actual assets. The
markets are essentially playing musical chairs—and praying that the music never stops. Because if it ever does—that is, if there is ever a panic,
where everyone decides that they want their actual asset instead of just a slip of paper—the system would crash.
How does a bank run get started?
Answer: When enough participants no longer trust the system. It is the classic definition of a tipping point. It’s not that all of the
participants lose faith in the system or institution. It’s not even when most of the participants lose faith: Rather, it’s when a mere some of the
participants decide they no longer trust the system that a run is triggered.
And though this is completely subjective on my part—backed by no statistics except scattered anecdotal evidence—but it seems to me that MF
Global has shoved us a lot closer to this theoretical run on the system.
As I write this, a lot of investors whom I know personally—who are sophisticated, wealthy, and not at all the paranoid type—are quietly pulling
their money out of all brokerage firms, all banks, all equity firms. They are quietly trading out of their paper assets and going into the actual,
physical asset.
The integrity of the systems has been completely shattered. If in the face of one medium-sized brokerage firm going under, the regulators will
openly allow ordinary people to be ripped off for the sake of protecting the so-called “Systemically Important Financial Institutions”—in this
case JPMorgan—what will happen if there is a system-wide run? What if two or three MF Globals happen simultaneously?
The consequences of such a run, given what happened with the bankruptcy of MF Global, paints a very ominous picture of what could happen, as two
tribes (banksters and customers) go to war against each other - one to save its “Systemically Important Financial Institution”, the other seeking
to get their money back.
And there will be such a run on the system: It’s only a matter of time. In fact, the handling of the MF Global affair has sped up the
timeframe for this run on the system, because the forward-edge players—such as Demeester, myself, and my other acquaintances who understand the
implications of the bankruptcy—realize that the regulators will side with the banksters, and not the ordinary investors: So we are preparing
accordingly.
Please refer to links for the full article.