this is worth watching,
timmey G acually says that he did not get a formal recusal or waiver for conflict of interest.
the questions go on and he realises that his answers make him look like he was not serving the public interest, and insinuate that timmey was working
for goldman sacks while in his official position at the treasury.
you tell me does it sound like he was faithfully exucuting the office of treasury for the public good,
or helping his buddies from goldman sacks, and working in private interests above and beyond the public good?
from the line of questions it sort of sounds like a case that timmey was caught with private interests as his primary concern. are at least it looks
like it from this congrestional hearing
lol timmey at the end claims he was working in the public interest
does not sound like it
xploder
edit on 8-12-2011 by XPLodER because: (no reason given)