It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by Samuelis
What kind of evidence are you looking for? A video of the afterlife? A picture of the magic fountain?
Don't mock me. I did not put an unreasonable burden of evidence on you guys. I only ask that the evidence you give is up to par with the things that pass for fact. Personal experiences are universally excluded from being scientific evidence in every instance.
I dont know how you would "prove" NDE's, but the burden of proof rest with you. You are the one making the claim and to convince me YOU have to put forward evidence. Your evidence falls so far below par that it is only "evidence" in the very loosest of terms.
Originally posted by 02bmw76
How about the information from France regarding the study of people killed by the guillotine? Charlotte Corday stabbed revolutionary leader Paul Marat in his bathtub and she was sentenced to the guillotine. After her head was removed from her body, the executioner's aide picked it up by the hair and slapped it. Witnesses swear that her cheeks blushed and mouth went into a sneer. Paris went wild! The aide was sent to prison for bad manners. Several French doctors devoted their careers to studying the effect of the guillotine. Dr Beauriex, in 1905, decided to run a few tests on a severed head. He noted that the victim had walked calmly to his death and that the head had landed upright. When he yelled the dead man's name in his ear the eyes opened wide! Dr Beauriex wrote, " I was dealing with undeniably living eyes which were looking at me. Several seconds later the eyes became closed slowly and evenly, taking the same appearance as before I called out. I called out again and once more,without any spasm, slowly, the eyelids lifted and undeniably living eyes fixed themselves on mine...". This just adds to the mystery of passing. No doubt the experience is real to those that make claim to their experiences. Gordon Michael Scallion's story is pretty interesting regarding his near death experience. I hope there is something on the other side. We won't really know until each of us gets there. I suppose it's just as much a possibility that when it's over it's over, Like a soap bubble that pops, it's done. It's a conundrum.
Originally posted by Tayesin
OP.. just say OK... this information is not based on Scientific Principles.
You can then say that there is a large body of non-scentific evidence relating to people's experiences after the death of their brain and other organs.
That should keep the more abusive types happy.. and why is that these types turn to abusive behaviours so quickly? Poor form to show their Limitations so eagerly.
'___'.. undoubtedly it plays an important part in the physical death process.. which I think is more about the patient becoming less concerned about death as they slowly begin to experience it.
Not for one second do I think '___' is responsible for what people report experiencing after the death of vital organs.
Science needs to understand something very important.. it is still very young and far from having the perfect understanding of anything that cannot be detected and measured.. all it's theories are modified and replaced as more repeatable observations information comes to Light.
As time goes by Science creates more machines that can detect and measure things that 50 to 100 years ago were thought of as crazy or only theoretical. Perhaps then in another 50 to 100 years it may accidentally discover a way to measure what it considers to be BS now ?
Let's hope so.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
And yet, you wont find NDE's presented as fact inside a textbook.edit on 7-12-2011 by TsukiLunar because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by angellicview
Originally posted by Tayesin
OP.. just say OK... this information is not based on Scientific Principles.
You can then say that there is a large body of non-scentific evidence relating to people's experiences after the death of their brain and other organs.
That should keep the more abusive types happy.. and why is that these types turn to abusive behaviours so quickly? Poor form to show their Limitations so eagerly.
'___'.. undoubtedly it plays an important part in the physical death process.. which I think is more about the patient becoming less concerned about death as they slowly begin to experience it.
Not for one second do I think '___' is responsible for what people report experiencing after the death of vital organs.
Science needs to understand something very important.. it is still very young and far from having the perfect understanding of anything that cannot be detected and measured.. all it's theories are modified and replaced as more repeatable observations information comes to Light.
As time goes by Science creates more machines that can detect and measure things that 50 to 100 years ago were thought of as crazy or only theoretical. Perhaps then in another 50 to 100 years it may accidentally discover a way to measure what it considers to be BS now ?
Let's hope so.
Thank you for your response. I would be willing to change the title of the thread if that would make others feel better about what I've presented here. I would change it to "Evidence" instead of "Scientific Evidence" to make others happy. But there is a four hour window to edit that and that has passed.
Originally posted by steveknows
This is an unabashed misleading thread heading. You should be ashamed of yourself.
I find it very sad that you feel you need to lie to get people to have a look at your thread.
If what you've said in the post was written in a book, which some bits are, it wouldn't be found in the science section of a library.edit on 8-12-2011 by steveknows because: Typo
Originally posted by overratedpatriotism
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
And yet, you wont find NDE's presented as fact inside a textbook.edit on 7-12-2011 by TsukiLunar because: (no reason given)
you mean like the. Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 219-239, 1993?
just sayin...
Originally posted by dannotz
reply to post by 1littlewolf
loved your reply.
All these peeps speaking about science don't realize that scientific evidence is something that an be repeated with the same results...this is happening with every NDE.
I can understand someone who wasnt dead having a hallucination in a hospital due to chemicals flowing through the brain. But when someone is DEAD for several minutes and wakes up with knowledge about things that happened not only in the room they were dead in, but other places around the world, well that's miraculous..
I love your avatar btw, very pretty.