It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"She was like, 'This is a federal offense because it's in the shape of a gun,'" Gibbs said. "I'm like, 'But it's a design on a purse. How is it a federal offense?'"
Originally posted by Glargod
reply to post by AwakeinNM
IAW the second amendment:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
You know things are going terribly wrong when
THE KID CAN'T EVEN HAVE A LOGO OF A FIREARM !edit on 3-12-2011 by Glargod because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
I understand the need for TSA. Too bad they are idiots.
Originally posted by Truth4Thought
I think I saw this posted in a different thread, sorry I can't find the link.
Hopefully I'm wrong so your thread can stay open. This is nuts!
There is no need for TSA. It's like saying "we need tougher gun laws" because nobody enforces the ones we have (although the ones we have are all unconstitutional).
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by AwakeinNM
There is no need for TSA. It's like saying "we need tougher gun laws" because nobody enforces the ones we have (although the ones we have are all unconstitutional).
In my opinion, this is not the same. Airports are private organizations and if they dont want you taking weapons on to their flights, then that is it. I wouldn't allow you to bring a gun into my home.
However, TSA goes way too far with their shenanigans.
Right. You couldn't take weapons onto their planes before TSA, either. But then again, back then nail clippers and shampoo weren't "weapons", were they?
Originally posted by jeichelberg
Has this story been confirmed by any reputable news source?