Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Second Iran Explosion? - Nuclear facility. Is this it I wonder?

page: 2
8
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 08:25 AM
link   
reply to post by jcord
 


It would be more effective if it blew up outside of the silo.
Otherwise it would be just a bomb going off underground, does not really do much.




posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 08:33 AM
link   
Yeah, and we all know how much the west loves collateral damage. It makes their god, Tammuz, happy.


Originally posted by Skewed
reply to post by jcord
 


It would be more effective if it blew up outside of the silo.
Otherwise it would be just a bomb going off underground, does not really do much.



posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 08:42 AM
link   
reply to post by jcord
 

That is why I said to wait until after it was launched to hack it. The way you say it, you make it sound as if it is ok for Iran to fire something but not ok for others. You do not think when Iran fires it that there would not be collateral damage.

It proves that Iran fired it, it just got returned to sender.
edit on 30-11-2011 by Skewed because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 10:12 AM
link   
reply to post by Skewed
 


The circumstances would matter. Iran firing in defense or retaliation is quite different from some other country blowing up a hypothetical Iranian nuke (that was not launched by Iranians) as an unprovoked strike. Collateral damage under the first circumstance is more justified than it would be under the latter. But since Iran is soon to be rubble it's all academic.



posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 10:18 AM
link   
If Iran threatened Israel and Turkey should the west "attack it", why would they deny the explosion?

Are they thinking that the west is baiting them and they are playing a wait and see game or was it an accident?



posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 10:26 AM
link   
reply to post by LookSkywatcher
 


For domestic purposes perhaps. If the US was attacked and came out and said it was an attack, the next step would be what? Go to the UN; attack unilaterally or go to the UN and then attack. What else is there and are any of those options options for Iran when the US is the UN? China and Russian will sit back rubbing their piggy banks thinking of all the stuff they get to resell to Iran.



posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 10:36 AM
link   
I would say this is it, and more than likely internal sabotage orchestrated by Israeli moles.

Major-General Giora Eiland, Israel's former director of national security, told Israel's army radio that the Isfahan blast was no accident. "There aren't many coincidences, and when there are so many events there is probably some sort of guiding hand, though perhaps it's the hand of God," he said.

www.theaustralian.com.au...


Question is how will Iran respond.
edit on 30-11-2011 by tarifa37 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 10:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by jcord
reply to post by Skewed
 


The circumstances would matter. Iran firing in defense or retaliation is quite different from some other country blowing up a hypothetical Iranian nuke (that was not launched by Iranians) as an unprovoked strike. Collateral damage under the first circumstance is more justified than it would be under the latter. But since Iran is soon to be rubble it's all academic.


Right or wrong, once the button is pushed everything is academic. It does not matter who started what. At that point one has to look at the situation as it is at that time and decide what the best course of action is. Once the first punch is thrown, the gloves come off and it is game on. The time for placing blame, pointing fingers and chest thumping is over. Then it becomes survival plain and simple, and which ever side can look and see how things are playing out and take the correct and appropriate defensive/offensive measures will be the ones that come out on top at the end of the day, if there is such a thing.



posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 04:11 PM
link   
Confirmed with Factiva news database, The Australian reprinted in full what The Times of London published in print.

Both Murdoch arms, so guess was correct...

Screenshot of Factiva Document T000000020111130e7bu0002e





posted on Nov, 30 2011 @ 11:36 PM
link   
I wonder if they have HP printers at that facility?


Just asking....
edit on 30-11-2011 by EdSurly because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 1 2011 @ 12:19 AM
link   
I cant believe you people still believe in the B.S. they feed us. Don't you "get it", yet? Every government, from every country, is "in on it"! We're the ones that still believe it's this side vs. that side. "They're all in bed together." There are no individual dictators...in any country, that weren't placed there, by DESIGN; and i don't care what country they're from: china, russia, iran, even the U.S. The only "enemies" on this planet...are those that are not with "them"!





new topics




 
8
<< 1   >>

log in

join