posted on Nov, 26 2011 @ 11:55 PM
Lead author Andreas Schmittner from Oregon State University, US..."This implies that the effect of CO2 on climate is less than previously
thought," he explained.
The researchers said people should still expect to see "drastic changes" in climate worldwide, but that the risk was a little less
...let's not get ahead of ourselves now - we need funding from this scam for a little while yet!!!
It should be pretty obvious by now that between this, the flawed "proof research" that used the TAMPERED data to do the proof with (whilst referring
to it as "the original data" even though it is widely acknowledged that the ORIGINAL data was LOST FOREVER), and the leaked e-mails from CRU (both
sets), that MMGW is not only bogus, but fabricated, in order to perpetrate a fraud against The People.
You only need to look at the people who were on the "independent panel" that investigated CRU after the first set of e-mails were leaked to see that
it is anything but "independent", but not only that, totally biased.
The people that were on the panel included the director of one of the largest wind turbine manufacturers in the world, the director of the "Future
Fuels" division at BP, two computer experts, one member of the House of Lords (part of the UK Government) and a geologist.
None of them
experts in climate, never mind science, and yet they seem to think CRU did nothing wrong, whilst being pretty obvious to those who really bother to
look that the "science" they conduct isn't science at all.
edit on 27-11-2011 by mirageofdeceit because: (no reason given)