reply to post by GLaDOS
This is a very skewed list. It throws genuine aggressive foreign intervention actions in with National Guard callups where they just stood around to
discourage violence. And by mixing in the Wrapup of Indian Wars, you are including domestic "interventions." Compared to many other countries, the
US doesn't hold a candle to actions within its own borders. They also include "interventions" separately that are part of the same action, ie
Guam/Cuba/Puerto Rico -all part of the same action. Phillipines can claim its own due to a long and bloody "insurgency" that followed the Spanish
American War. And including WW2? The US was attacked on it own soil. In other words, this list is making itself blatantly slanted and manipulated to
anyone who knows anything about history.
Which is working against its own cause. If one were just honest and straightforward, most Latin American interventions since 1890 on behalf of large
corporations are enough to make someone angry. And, of course, Cold War engagements all over the world.
There is no need to try and exaggerate and skew the numbers here. On a whole, there is a good case against many of the foreign interventions by the
US. But, by including WW2, small National Guard activations, domestic Indian Wars, breaking one intervention into many, etc this list is a fail.
Just trying too hard and by doing so, hurts its legitimacy.