posted on Nov, 9 2011 @ 02:03 AM
reply to post by Stunspot
This is a war of ideas.
Paul is the only candidate who doesn't seem totally hypnotized by the accepted ideologies of the mainstream.
If he doesn't run, then it won't be worth voting. And if he doesn't get a chance to go up against Obama, then we should either do a write-in
campaign for him, or noisily
What we are trying to do is send a message back into a system that expects all of us to accept all of its messages to us without question. It's a
criminal system now, and the message we are trying to send is that we are onto them and no longer intend to play along.
The price to regain our support and cooperation would be total honesty. Paul may not be totally honest, but compared to the others he is an angel.
That's why he is getting the support he's getting. People respond well to honesty. This is the weakest point in the criminal plan. Because they
can't be honest and be criminals at the same time.
One of the most common criminal exploits in a neighborhood they are trying to move into is called the "protection racket." I quote Wikipedia:
A protection racket is an extortion scheme whereby a criminal group or individual coerces a victim (usually a business) to pay money, supposedly for
protection services against violence or property damage. Racketeers coerce reticent potential victims into buying "protection" by demonstrating what
will happen if they don't—they damage the victims' property. In most cases, the racketeers do not actually protect their client from anything but
the racketeers themselves, and their "protection" is merely extortion. However, if their victim is seriously threatened by a third party, sometimes
gangsters will protect their source of revenue.
This is exactly what is happening in America at this time.
How do the victims of such a racket regain the upper hand? In most cases, it takes real courage. Because almost for sure someone's going to die. As
anyone who has looked knows, many already have. It takes a combination of bravery and finesse to win out against the criminal mind. We have one
apparent advantage of this point. Certain portions of the military seem to be onto the scam. The Marines seem to be standing out in this regard. A lot
of local police departments are not onto the scam, and are dutifully playing their role in finding excuses to arrest "enemies of the state."
The best way to turn the tables is to claim that you actually have control over something that is very dear to the criminals, and that they will lose
it if they don't back down. In this case, it would be our willingness to fund their global police system, which consists primarily of US military
bases. If we let them know that everyone realizes they are running a protection racket on the planet and that we no longer intend to provide them with
their "muscle," they would back off. And if Paul gets a lot of support, or if their candidates get very little, that would be one way to send such a
message. I think Paul knows about this and it's the main reason he talks so much about all our overseas bases and military involvements. That sort of
talk scares them because it makes sense. So they've told the mainstream media to ignore Paul, hoping this will prevent his ideas from gaining any