It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A nice catch from our friends at Investors Business Daily today paints a portrait at the selectiveness of class-warrior outrage in the Obama administration. When AIG and other bailout recipients started to pay their remaining executives the bonuses for which they were contractually obligated, Barack Obama led a chorus of outrage against the private-sector firms:
Public Sector: When bailed-out private Wall Street banks handed out bonuses last year, the president threw a fit. So why is he ignoring the huge executive bonuses at government-owned Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?
Originally posted by neo96
Meh this rates a five thumbs down on my worthless meter
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by neo96
Meh this rates a five thumbs down on my worthless meter
What a coincidence, that's the number I gave to this thread. FM/FM have been around for a long time and were in deep doodoo under another POTUS. Dredging that up and blaming the current POTUS is not only partisan, it's untrue.
I'll be here all week. Please, tip your waitress.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Government-controlled mortgage giant Freddie Mac has requested $6 billion in additional aid after posting a wider loss in the third quarter.
Shortly after taking office, President Obama reacted to Wall Street bonuses handed out in January 2009 with incredibly harsh language, calling them "shameful" and "the height of irresponsibility."
"Folks on Wall Street who are asking for help need to show some restraint and show some discipline and show some sense of responsibility," he said. A few months later, Obama pledged that there would be "no more bonuses for companies that taxpayers are helping out," calling them a violation of "our fundamental values."
The growth of private-label securitization and lack of regulation in this part of the market resulted in the oversupply of underpriced housing finance[32] that led, in 2006, to an increasing number of borrowers, often with poor credit, who were unable to pay their mortgages - particularly with adjustable rate mortgages (ARM), caused a precipitous increase in home foreclosures. As a result, home prices declined as increasing foreclosures added to the already large inventory of homes and stricter lending standards made it more and more difficult for borrowers to get mortgages. This depreciation in home prices led to growing losses for the GSEs, which back the majority of US mortgages. In July 2008, the government attempted to ease market fears by reiterating their view that "Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac play a central role in the US housing finance system". The US Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve took steps to bolster confidence in the corporations, including granting both corporations access to Federal Reserve low-interest loans (at similar rates as commercial banks) and removing the prohibition on the Treasury Department to purchase the GSEs' stock. Despite these efforts, by August 2008, shares of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had tumbled more than 90% from their one-year prior levels.
Originally posted by intrepid
Was Obama president in 2007?
Originally posted by beezzer
While it is true that Bush started this bailout...
...it is akin to blaming Bush for Obama's efforts in pouring gas on a raging fire.
Nice work, Neo.
While it is true that Bush started this bailout, it is akin to blaming Bush for Obama's efforts in pouring gas on a raging fire.
Six banks repaid nearly half a billion dollars in funds they received from the government bailout of Wall Street, the Treasury Department said, bringing the total bank repayment under the Troubled Asset Relief Program to 99%.
Originally posted by neo96
Bush didn't bailout GM and Chrysler nor wasted billions of Solyndra,Beacon,Sunpower...
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by beezzer
While it is true that Bush started this bailout...
There you go.
...it is akin to blaming Bush for Obama's efforts in pouring gas on a raging fire.
He doesn't have to react to what's happened before? What is that? The "Pontius Pilate" defense? Wash ones hands after the fact?
Nice work, Neo.
For what? I'm curious?
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
Yes, you sure can blame him for continuing the problem, but you seriously can't try to blame Nobama for policies Bush enacted.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by neo96
Bush didn't bailout GM and Chrysler nor wasted billions of Solyndra,Beacon,Sunpower...
You're right but what has that got to do with FM/FM? Your topic remember.
Originally posted by beezzer
Neo brings to light the aspects of this administration that the MSM and much of the alternate media try to downplay.
And, um, Obama is POTUS. Your comments on Bush may well be better suited on a thread titled, "It's still Bush's fault."