It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by intrptr
There's plenty of publically available radiation monitoringavailable for the west coast of the USA - how about you actually search for it (the link took me 10 seconds) instead of waiting for a spoonfeeed of something that isn't actually news?? .
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
reply to post by dashen
"Japan Nuclear Disaster Released Higher Radiation Levels Than Previously Reported, Study Finds?"
"No kidding? Really?"edit on 10/27/2011 by this_is_who_we_are because: typo
Originally posted by dashen
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
Well DUH you were being sarcastic, and I was pointing out that it may be too serious a thing to be sarcastic about.
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
reply to post by dashen
I was being sarcastic. Check my signature and you'll find a link to the most comprehensive Fukushima thread I've found on ATS so far. It's by "thorfourwinds". I've been following this for a while.
Japan is reporting that Fukushima nuclear fuel has burned through the containment vessel and is sitting on the concrete foundation of the plant leaking into the groundwater.
TEPCO says an underground barrier needed to stop the molten lava from spreading in groundwater will cost too much money and will hurt their stock price.
...
Japanese government officials have echoed this statement and have called on TEPCO to build an underground concrete barrier beneath the reactor which would be the only way to stop the molten fuel that is now leaking into the groundwater.
TEPCO so far is refusing to do so because the cost of the project will be over 100 billion yen.
But, confirming previous assessments, it said caesium levels had been hugely diluted by ocean currents and, except for near-shore species, posed no discernible threat.
There is a gap between them and us.
Between the phoney scientists and the public who don’t believe what they say.
Between those who are employed and paid to protect us from radioactive pollution and those who die from its consequences.
Between those who talk down what is arguably the greatest public health scandal in human history, and the facts that they ignore.
“[color=limegreen]Let’s wipe the Tokyo Electric Power Company and the General Electric officials and policy makers off the face of the Earth, as they manifestly deserve.”...
Liberty & Equality
or
Revolution
From March 21 to mid-July, 27.1 peta becquerels of caesium 137 entered the sea, the Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) said.
One peta becquerel is a million billion bequerels, or 10 to the power of 15.
Of the total, 82 percent entered the sea before April 8, through water that was pumped into the Fukushima's damaged reactor units in a bid to cool them down, it said.
"This is the biggest single outflow of man-made radionuclides to the marine environment ever observed," the agency said in a press release.
Caesium is a slow-decaying element, taking 30 years to lose half of its radioactivity.
The IRSN said large quantities of iodine 131 also entered the sea as a result of the disaster, caused by the March 11 9.0-magnitude quake that occurred off northeastern Japan.
But iodine 131 decays quickly, having a half-life of eight days, and the contamination "swiftly diminished," the report said.
The IRSN said that, for the Pacific generally, caesium levels would ultimately stabilise at 0.004 becquerels per litre thanks to the diluting effect of powerful ocean currents.
This is twice the concentration that prevailed during atmospheric nuclear testing in the 1960s.
"These levels should not have an impact in terms of radiological safety," the IRSN said.
However, "significant pollution of seawater on the coast near the damaged plant could persist," because of continuing runoff of contaminated rainwater from the land, it said.
"Maintaining monitoring of marine species taken in Fukushima's coastal waters is justified," it said.
The IRSN cited [color=limegreen]deep-water fish, fish at the top of the marine food chain and molluscs and other filtrating organisms as 'the species that are the most sensitive' to caesium pollution.
...caesium levels would ultimately stabilise at 0.004 becquerels per litre...
Liberty & Equality
or
Revolution
Originally posted by thorfourwinds
...caesium levels would ultimately stabilise at 0.004 becquerels per litre...
0.004 becquerels per liter!
Every liter in the whole blessed ocean? Please tell us that this is a misreading on our part, please do tell us.
One Bq is defined as the activity of a quantity of radioactive material in which one nucleus decays per second.
The curie (Ci) is an older, non-SI unit of radioactivity equal to the activity of 1 gram of radium-226.
The conversion factors are:
1 Ci = 3.7×10^10 Bq