I've noticed that some people here in the survival forum are either interested in an ATV for survival, or might fall into the category of an ATV
buyer. I have a lot of experience with ATVs in pretty dismal terrain because everyone where I grew up owned one, and they all put them through hell,
for lack of a better description. Some made it, and some were junk after a few years. Some are still in the trenches, steadily fighting, since about
1991. Some of these machines are good enough to last for twenty years in conditions that most would consider unreasonable for a vehicle to survive
in.
Why an ATV?
The reason that an ATV is a desirable survival vehicle is because they're tough, some of the better brand/models can take abuse, and never complain.
They're also good on gas. A smaller displacement ATV can go for a few hundred miles on one tank of gas, provided it's in good operating condition.
They're capable in any terrain, mud, sand, snow, water, climbing. I've driven ATVs up roads that were so steep walking without a tow rope was
nearly impossible. They're quick, and they're quiet. An ATV can accelerate very quickly, almost as fast as a motorcycle, and with a stock muffler
can be somewhat stealthy. They can cover a lot of ground quickly over rough terrain, if you push the machine to it's limits. Most of the normal
non-performance oriented ATVs will run on low grade gasoline, or even stale gasoline. It's not recommended, but they're resilient in the fuel area
as well.
Which one to buy
When shopping for an ATV for survival purposes, you need to consider a few things about the machine. Durability, reliability, gas mileage, off road
capability, and "foolproof design". Most of those are self explanatory, except for the "fool proof design" factor. What that means, is how well
is the machine protected from stupidity. Does it have a raised intake snorkel? Does it have strong steel skid plates? What kind of transmission
does it have? How many "quick fix" buttons does it have on it? A quick fix button is something that's built into the vehicle, to fix a small but
common issue quickly, like a back up kick starter, or a fuel primer. For all of the above factors, imo, no one has it more right than Honda.
I've heard that the newer Honda's are not as good as the old ones, but I have no basis for comparison because everyone that I know that rides Honda,
is still using a 1990s model because they have had no reason to buy another ATV. One thing that I really like about Honda, is their waterproofing
system. They have an intake and system of lines raised beyond the water level of a floating ATV. This means, that as long as you do not flip the
vehicle in water, it can float across as much water as you're comfortable trying. The only downside is, that after about 5 feet when the machine can
no longer touch bottom at all, it's nearly impossible to keep it right side up. The gyroscopic effect from the wheels churning the water will flip
it over.
That ATV has nothing other than the factory intake setup. I've heard that little feat referred to as, "the 300 trick", and it does work. In
certain situations having a machine built this well, can be the only way out.
The other guys. The heavy ATV sunk straight to the bottom, and the air intake wasn't high enough. Bigger is often a bad thing in the ATV
world.
Another fool proof area to look over, is the transmission. A constant velocity transmission looks good to a potential buyer, but they're not a good
choice for survival because even a small amount of water finding it's way past the cover, will strand you and your ATV.
Wet CVT belt. Notice the smoke coming from around the engine, and the lack of 4wd. He probably destroyed the belt.
The best transmission options for a stout survival ATV is to find one with a semi-automatic. It works like any other manual, except the clutch is
more like a torque converter on an automatic transmission for a car. You do not use a clutch for shifting. A sport utility is the only type of ATV
that's likely to meet all of your requirements for a woods/survival vehicle. The sport models do not have the same foolproof design or off road
capabilities as the sport utility 4x4s.
Accessorize!
Yes, everyone's favorite part of survival, finding the cool things that hopefully serve a purpose. After you've chosen an ATV, you're going to
want to add a few items to any model. The most important area, is the tires. Most factory style tires are only 2 ply, and may be destroyed by a
sharp rock. The easiest way to fix the problem, is to upgrade to some aftermarket 6 or 8ply all terrain tires. This will give you improved flat
resistance, an increase in wheel weight, and better all around traction. The weight of this tires is substantially higher than the stock tires, so
remain within the factory sizing for the best reliability. Here's one that's been around for a while, and that many people like: Gbc Dirt Devil
There are many options for tires, so don't be afraid to shop around. Another good item to get, is additional fuel capacity.
These are an old
product that can be stacked on your ATVs racks, or mounted with the brackets out of the way. They can increase your fuel capacity by 20 gallons or
more if you're only using the racks to carry fuel. If you're a hunter, you may enjoy my Dad's favorite accessory, the
handle bar gun carrier. It keeps
your gun or bow in an easy spot for quick access. The last thing that you need to think about, is a
winch, if you're traveling solo. If you're
traveling with more than one ATV, it's not needed. There are many accessories to choose from, but these are the ones that most survivalists will get
the most use from.
Test it!
Yes, many people will enjoy an ATV in a non-survival situation, so take yours out and see what it's made of. If it's going to break, now is the
time to break it. Remember to always wear a helmet and take whatever drivers course your manufacturer offers!
I have a Honda Rincon 650. which is a big battle tank. It’s a wonderful work horse on my farm ,,,HOWEVER if you get her stuck you are not getting
out alone. That being said. People need to look at what they want to do with the machine and should not buy one because it’s the biggest baddest
machine East of the Mississip. The nimble 250’s 350’s or 400’s are great machines that can maneuver in tight places, plenty of power and light
enough for one person retrieval. Sometimes size doesn’t matter and sometimes size imakes the ride that much better!!
Big machines can be a big mistake for the weekend survivalist.
edit on 19-10-2011 by BioSafe because: (no reason given)
6, 8wheel and amphibious vehicles are great, if you never intend to leave a swamp. They're slow and fragile on dry ground. They're also dangerous in
any water that's moving fast. Most people would not want one. If you live in Louisiana or another state with a lot of marshland, then it might be
good for you.
The Argo amphibious types have no suspension, and when bouncing over bumps at their slow 20-25 mph top speed the axles and drivetrain tend to be
problematic.
edit on 19-10-2011 by Evolutionsend because: (no reason given)
The OP is right on target. You described the 6 atv's in my garage. All Honda 300s. Absolutely bullet proof. Easy to work on and/or fix if the need
arises. Very much a shame that they stopped production of the 300 back in 2000.
Atv's only will have value if you have gas sure they get some good gas mileage for any good survival strategy is not dependent upon any one tool and
an atv is just another tool that can break down and run out of gas.
The 4 legged animal like horse's is a safe bet but then again that depends on it's fuel source which is hay and grass if you can find an atv that runs
on diesel your golden because that fuel can be switched with any other survival vehicle which agian should run on diesel.
Great thought in theory real world experiences will vary.
edit on 19-10-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Having worked on various Off-road motorcycles,Buggies andATV's i can say if you want an end of the world machine,let it be the honda fourtrax
line(sometimes called "big red" depending on country/market) the 4x4 >250cc machines are unbeleivably tough,seen one run 4 half an hour round a
quarry with no engine oil!,after the engine cooled we added fresh oil and it fired up,albeit with severe knock!haha
Another fool proof area to look over, is the transmission. A constant velocity transmission looks good to a potential buyer, but they're not a good
choice for survival because even a small amount of water finding it's way past the cover, will strand you and your ATV.
I would strongly advise against cvt type power-trains,cheaper ones tend to slip rather annoyingly when placed under load,also are heavier on
petrol(Gas to the yankee-types).plus a manual is faster,more versatile over gradients,and if this were to be used in a SHTF scenario where fuel is a
commodity wasting it is the last thing you need!
For ATVs I would also have to go with honda. Enen though i really love Arctic Cats. Hondas can make it through everything and is pretty cheap. since
there smaller frames the are more nimble and better on gas mileage.
That was my point about CVT, they stink. Semi-automatic is the best transmission option for sport utility 4x4s. A semi-automatic is the name for a
manual transmission without a clutch. You shift it with a foot lever like any other manual cycle, but it has an automatic clutch. It's the most
reliable you can get on a sport utility 4x4. I've never heard of a 4x4 with a full manual with a clutch before.
I kid you not, my uncle bought an Arctic Cat 400 in 2005, and by 2008 it had blown a head gasket and was pulled to the main road by a 1991 Honda 300
4x4. He bought the ATV when my Dad was riding an already old bike, and the Honda outlasted it.
I remember reading about an interview a publication conducted with a Honda test rider a long time ago. They asked him, what was the silliest thing
you've ever had to do in testing. His answer, was to ride around on a Honda in first gear with the throttle wide open until it ran out of gas. He
said it took 22 hours, and it did it without a hiccup.
They don't really break. I've never seen my favorite model break down. You could try throwing it off a cliff, or maybe rolling it around in a river
a while. That might break it. Oh wait, my uncle flipped the '91 Honda 300 and sent it down a nearly vertical hill without a rider for a couple
hundred feet. It didn't break, but it did bend the front bumper when it finally stopped. Okay, so maybe rolling it upside down under the water
might break it. I'll provide pictures of the damage tomorrow. It's still at my Dad's being used.
My Dad's friend that lives next door on a horse ranch, says that his Honda is more reliable than his horse, and he loves his horse. He has a Honda
Foreman 4x4 for ranch duty.
The only diesel ATVs I've ever seen have been released by less than reputable manufacturers. Do you really need to go watch the Polaris video again?
It won't matter what it burns if it can't even turn all 4 tires in 4 wheel drive. Any brand that would rather buy engines from KTM for their
flagship sport ATV, than produce their own, is not a manufacturer that I'm buying from.
Sure, it uses gas, but it uses a lot less gas than a deuce and a half.
edit on 19-10-2011 by Evolutionsend because: (no reason given)
I am not knockin ktm as a manufacturer but ROTAX,who supplies their engines,may also be the case for some polaris machines IIRC,are generally poorer
than some of the manufacturers that create their own engines,Hondas just never cease to amaze me tho,have had the privilege of owning a few honda
motorcycles,id struggle to accept any other manufacturer,even other japanese manufacturers
I am not knockin ktm as a manufacturer but ROTAX,who supplies their engines,may also be the case for some polaris machines IIRC,are generally poorer
than some of the manufacturers that create their own engines,Hondas just never cease to amaze me tho,have had the privilege of owning a few honda
motorcycles,id struggle to accept any other manufacturer,even other japanese manufacturers
I am not knockin ktm as a manufacturer but ROTAX,who supplies their engines,may also be the case for some polaris machines IIRC,are generally poorer
than some of the manufacturers that create their own engines,Hondas just never cease to amaze me tho,have had the privilege of owning a few honda
motorcycles,id struggle to accept any other manufacturer,even other japanese manufacturers
I know a lot of them do. That's why I would never buy from the manufacturer that does that. If they do not have faith in their product, then
neither do I. Polaris has been building engines for a long time, they just aren't very good at it, so they would rather buy them from someone else.
That's a triple post btw. I've never seen that here. Something wrong with your computer?
S+F! Really good informative post. I don't really have any experience or knowledge regarding honda's 4-wheelers but I remember the late early 90s
maybe even late 80s honda 3-wheelers being super reliable. Most of my 4-wheeling was done on Polaris ATVs and they was all newer models within a year
or two old in the late 90s early 2000s. I am long way from purchasing a 4-wheeler for a bug out vehicle but I do hope to one day obtain a good one.
I think we've got three for Honda and a few undecideds. I'm in the Honda camp. ATVs cost a lot and having a new one with issues is a real sinking
feeling. Make sure you take your time and get something good.
This is what happens when a Honda goes down a mountain without a rider.
It went down a mountain that was around a 70% grade, and finally stopped when it rammed into a fallen tree. The front bumper and rack got pushed back
a few inches in the collision. Getting it out was the hard part. We had to get it around that fallen tree and ride it down the hill and onto a
different road, it was too steep to climb out. The gun holders were ripped off, and the front bumper/rack was bent. The frame didn't bend, and it
started right up. They're pretty adept at not breaking.