Ron Paul Media Blackout Confirmed: (Evidence proves it!), page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 29 times
Topic started on 17-10-2011 @ 01:55 PM by anon72

From May 2 to October 9, Paul appeared as the "primary newsmaker in only 2% of all election stories."


Ron Paul loyalists have been vindicated. After months of observations that the mainstream media was ignoring the libertarian standard-bearer, a new study by the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism shows just that: the Texas Congressman, who has consistently polled in the high single digits -- Real Clear Politics's aggregate poll currently has him at 8 percent -- has received the least overall coverage of any candidate.
The study measured mainstream exposure by compiling a list of 52 mainstream news outlets across "newspapers, cable news, broadcast television, the 12 most popular news websites in the country, and radio news." To register as a story about the candidate, he/she had to be the focus of at least 50 percent of the story. Interestingly, while Paul gained short shrift from the mainstream press, the blogosphere was an entirely different story, where the tone of his coverage was more favorable than for any other candidate:
While complaints about a lack of media coverage are typical coming from any struggling candidate, Paul boosters, and even some independent observers, have argued that Paul's media blackout is particularly striking considering his concrete successes on the campaign trail.


Source:
www.theatlanticwire.com...

Please go to the main article for additonal info and the charts/graph, Paul wins around the election cycle etc. The evidence clearly shows the Media/MSM had decided to keep him the hell out of the picture... but WHY?

Why collectively... or more interesting/important HOW? How did it happen-the "Black-balling of Ron Paul"?

Did they meet and discuss saying "Lets put the screws to Ron Paul"? Did they follow the lead of one MSM company.... say CNN? Do they just look at popularity of people who are liking to Paul? who knows but I am afraid it has worked.

Ron Paul won't be the President of the US in 2012. He doesn't even stand a chance without some Media support. Not at this point in the game. It sure seems like the media wants old Mitt to be the Republican runner.

Time will tell.
edit on 10/17/2011 by anon72 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 17-10-2011 @ 08:08 PM by anon72
reply to post by Gmoneycricket



that is too funny. Sad but true... I guess.

Star for your effort!!


reply posted on 18-10-2011 @ 06:55 AM by korathin
reply to post by TheWalkingFox



I don't care. If Ron Paul doesn't win then Ron Paul supporters should just leave the Republican Party. Incase you haven't noticed, the more anti Paul the media is, the more their viewership is tanking. I don't watch MSM at all, not even for #s and giggles anymore.


reply posted on 18-10-2011 @ 08:43 AM by TinfoilTP
Boo hoo

Cain had the same 2% according to that skewed graph which shows both having a 2 but Paul's bar is shorter LOLOLOLOL.
What makes it even funnier is that Cain is now winning,

Cain beats Obama in Poll

Cain Squeaks Ahead of Obama in New General Election Poll


Ron Paul just had zero message, his delivery scared everyone away, and he is just plain annoying to see and listen to.

An analogy.
Ron Paul dropped the pizza in the dirt, delivered it cold and to the wrong house.
Herman Cain delivered the pizza ontime and fresh.


reply posted on 1-3-2012 @ 04:06 PM by Gseven
Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
Saturday Night Live Mocks the Media Blackout of Ron Paul



www.youtube.com...


That video is now blocked, and I just realized the date it was posted.
edit on 1-3-2012 by Gseven because: content



reply posted on 1-3-2012 @ 06:43 PM by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Gmoneycricket





This video contains content from NBC Universal, who has blocked it on copyright grounds.

Copyrights
edit on 1-3-2012 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^