'Fast and Furious' Was Plot Against Second Amendment: (NRA-prove the theory wrong...), page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 14-10-2011 @ 07:54 PM by anon72
The government-sanctioned gunrunning operation, Fast and Furious, was a plot to undermine Second Amendment rights in the United States, National Rifle Association president Wayne LaPierre charged on Friday
“It’s the only thing that makes any sense,” LaPierre said. “Over a period of two or three years they were running thousands and thousands of guns to the most evil people on earth. At the same time they were yelling ’90 per cent… of the guns the Mexican drug cartels are using come from the United States.’
“That was a phony figure from the very start. Even the Wikileaks cables from our own State Department prove they are coming from Central America, they are not coming from the U.S. Every police officer will tell you that they’re coming from Russia, they’re coming from China, most of them are coming from Central America and a lot of them are coming from defections from the Mexican Army.”
But LaPierre said that President Barack Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were determined to make it appear that most weapons used by the Mexicans came from north of the border, “so they could stick more gun legislation on honest American gun owners of the United States.”
LaPierre insisted that the whole Fast and Furious scandal, in which he said “thousands and thousands” of weapons were allowed to cross into Mexico, would never have come to light at all if it hadn’t been for last December’s murder of U.S. Border Agent Brian Terry in Arizona.


Source:

Well, it is the only thing that makes sense. Otherwise.... lets here it from the people involved at the ATF and Justice Department. Tell me/us what the theory was behind the F&F program. Prove it to me/us with emails, operational request/planning and authorization signatured paper. NOW.

Stop stone walling. You are making us/the USA look even more inept under Obama.

I can't help but feel that arrest or impeachment(s) are coming down the pike quick like.

I just saw on Drudge the the Obama Adminstration is REFUSING to release the Solar power company Solandra paperwork/emails. SCREW YOU.

Which brings me/us back to the question I have been asking from the beginning. Who will enforce any law against a sitting POTUS if in fact a court were to order it?


reply posted on 14-10-2011 @ 11:44 PM by xuenchen
reply to post by anon72





But LaPierre said that President Barack Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were determined to make it appear that most weapons used by the Mexicans came from north of the border, “so they could stick more gun legislation on honest American gun owners of the United States.”



And the real dumb part is they actually expected the general public to buy into this.

It's almost like they wanted us to think that 10,000 US citizens sold 10,000 guns to 10,000 Mexicans who then went to Mexico and sold 10,000 guns to drug cartels.

Were any of the guns previously owned legally by individual US citizens, or were they all bought from manufacturers by licensed dealers?

But the way they've been passing legislation that never benefits the majority of citizens, this would have been easy ... not so much now, but with the 111th Congress yes.

Fast and Furious was "Too Little Too Late"
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul is NOT dropping out, the Mainstream Media is LYING.
  Posted 15 days ago with 111 member flags
Report: Romney Will Be Disqualified From Race Due To Fraud
  Posted 18 days ago with 105 member flags
Evidence of Vote Flipping in GOP Primary Elections
  Posted 7 days ago with 88 member flags
Fox News Analyst: First American to shoot down drone will be a hero
  Posted 14 days ago with 68 member flags
Mitt Romney scared Ron Paul is winning!!!
  Posted 7 days ago with 62 member flags
Let\'s just say it: Political Parties are the Problem
  Posted 12 days ago with 60 member flags