It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you happen to be a billionaire or corporate Fat Cat, you may have noticed a mob assembled near your headquarters or home recently. You may not know what they’re protesting exactly; you might even joke that perhaps this has something to do with why they are unemployed. But when it comes to their complaint that the rich have been getting richer while things keep getting worse for the poor, downtrodden and unemployed, you gotta admit, they have a point.
While the stagnant economy continues to hurt those at the bottom of the American workforce, there’s plenty of money for the .0001 percent at the top. (The compensation totals, compiled by Forbes’ stats guru Scott DeCarlo, include salary, bonuses, perks and the value of exercised stock options through Sept. 6. Sources are CompuStat ExecuComp and SEC filings).
Compensation for the chief executives of America’s biggest corporations is way up in 2011, 28 percent higher than last year on average, according to GovernanceMetrics International. If you were already in the top quartile of high-paid plutocrats, your comp nearly doubled. Cash bonuses are triple what they were before the recession.
Originally posted by CaDreamer
BTW these top execs that are mentioned in the article are all big pharma CEO's so they all work for companies that trade on wall street. that puts them in the cross hairs of the OWS protesters.
reply to post by tothetenthpower
Why aren't they putting this money to good use building schools and creating community out reach programs for the less fortunate?
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by amaster
So according to your logic the extremely successful aren't responsible for helping the rest of the country flourish? You believe in wealth inequality then?
I don't understand your sentiment here. Of course people need to take responsibility for themselves, but how do you do that when no corporation wants to pay the average worker what they are worth?
How do you go back to school and gain more skills to get that higher paying job if you can't afford the student loan? Or to raise your children on 1 salary while your spouse goes back to school?
This isn't about being jealous that rich people have more. Hell in Canada I'd be considered "rich", but I give a lot of it away to charities and local organizations because I don't need all that wealth, it's unnecessary. I'd rather put it to good use helping my neighbors and community than hoard it.
This whole argument is about the rich not paying their fair share. About the unwillingness to work towards progress instead of the status quo or bottom line.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
So according to your logic the extremely successfull aren't responsible for helping the rest of the country flourish? You believe in wealth inequality then?...
I don't understand your sentiment here. Of course people need to take responsibility for themselves, but how do you do that when no corporation wants to pay the average worker what they are worth?
How do you go back to school and gain more skills to get that higher paying job if you can't afford the student loan? Or to raise your children on 1 salary while your spouse goes back to school?
This isn't about being jealous that rich people have more. Hell in Canada I'd be considered "rich", but I give a lot of it away to charities and local organizations because I don't need all that wealth, it's unecessary. I'd rather put it to good use helping my neighboors and community than hoard it.
This whole argument is about the rich not paying their fair share. About the unwillingness to work towards progress instead of the status quo or bottom line.
Your version of "progress" is yours. Is there any more apparently simple but realistically false term then "Fair Share" and how do you implement your happy version of it while TPTB destroy everyone's chance?