Erm... Can you provide a link for us, first of all?

Second, if the study suggests two glasses of milk per day, where did you get human milk from? How do you know they did not mean milk from a cow?



Or am I just missing something and I am making a fool of myself?

That said, I love milk... From a cow that is.

Originally posted by Required01

Are you joking? Women 'should' be able to give milk there entire life?
Is it not 'proven' that calcium increases the strength of our bones?

Of course I'm joking around, but it puts things into perspective - doesn't it?

If milk were a "necessity" for adult males, then the human female mammal would produce milk her whole life for the adult male population to get this alleged "necessity" of nutrients in milk. So if the military from the late 1940s/early 1950s claims that adult men and soldiers "need" this milk, then do you feel that human females should lactate year round their whole life to supply the soldiers/adult men with this "necessity" the old study claims they need?

Calcium also comes from green leafy vegetables. You don't have to get it from milk. And there is a bunch of misconceptions about milk put out by the milk industry.

Mother's milk of any mammal, softens, yes softens bones to stop them from hardening so that bones can grow. Hardened bones without the milk don't really grow so well. But softened bones grow. So it's not that the milk itself gives instantly strengthened bones...but rather softens them so they can grow strong. There's a difference.