It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by NewAgeMan
Ask yourself this, if i dropped a brick of steel on an egg, would the very real resistance the egg offered actualy meaningfully slow the brick?
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
And the firemen..?
Originally posted by Praetorius
And the fact that no steel-reinforced skyscrapers have ever collapsed as a result of fire, before or after - until 9/11 when three did - strains credibility.
Originally posted by Gazmeister
Originally posted by Praetorius
And the fact that no steel-reinforced skyscrapers have ever collapsed as a result of fire, before or after - until 9/11 when three did - strains credibility.
Yes, but no other steel reinforced skyscrapers have been hit by a Boeing 767 before have they?
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Recently it seems to me that 9/11 Conspiracists have retreated to a point where they discuss only the "physics" of the collapse of the WTC towers. They brush aside the discussion of a grander conspiracy because the mechanics of the tower collapse are inherently suspisous. Any other argument is trumped by the fact that the towers cannot - simply cannot - have collapsed in the manner that they did.
So I would like to hear, in brief precis, why the collapse is impossible. Describe to me why, in simple terms, it cannot have happened without explosives.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by sailiraq
You only saw PARTS of the tower collapse after 10 seconds, but the whole thing did not collapse in 10 seconds...
Most of the collapse was hidden by the clouds of dust, but it can be seen that they did not collapse in 10 seconds...
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
Some of the firemen were blown right off their feet and covered in white powder.
Originally posted by JordanTwoDelta
So.. you were there with a timer? pics or it didn't happen.
You're right that the top section didn't remain in tact. In fact, it blew apart right away, while the fountain of cascading debris was explosively ejected, as the debris wave moved all the way down the remaining structure to within a mere few seconds of absolute free fall.
What you are asking us to believe is impossible and violates the three laws of motion.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Originally posted by JordanTwoDelta
So.. you were there with a timer? pics or it didn't happen.
We, members of ATS, have counted the seconds several times over the years.
Just because you see some parts hitting the ground doesn't mean the whole thing fell in 10 seconds...
Originally posted by JordanTwoDelta
So.. you were there with a timer? pics or it didn't happen.
Originally posted by JordanTwoDelta
I understand that. But before you said it was not visible due to clouds of dust. Which means if WE can't see it... you can't see it either - that is my point. Your argument could work both ways.
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
YES!
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by sailiraq
You only saw PARTS of the tower collapse after 10 seconds, but the whole thing did not collapse in 10 seconds...
Most of the collapse was hidden by the clouds of dust, but it can be seen that they did not collapse in 10 seconds...
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
I am aware of femr and Major Tom but do not pretend I read most of the stuff they write.
psik
There were 110 stories in the twin towers and the fall took 10 seconds. That's 11 stories per second. Even suspended by the slightest support each massive floor would have taken more than one tenth of a second to accelerate. Another analogy that might help you see that impacting a mass absorbs energy and does not contribute to velocity but rather subtracts from it would be a row of parked cars impacted from behind by even a massive semi-trailer. Each car will absorb some of the truck's energy, and the truck will slow to a stop. That is exactly what would have happened to the upper floors of the Twin Towers had the only energy involved been gravitational potential energy converted to kinetic energy.
This addresses the energy necessary to accelerate the mass of the buildings without even considering the massive amount of added energy necessary to turn thousands of tons of concrete into fine powder. Where did that energy come from?