Marine who said no to killing on his conscience, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 5-4-2003 @ 11:23 AM by Saphronia
The first American conscientious objector from the Iraq war will give himself up at a marine base in California this morning. He said he believed the war was "immoral because of the deception involved by our leaders".

Link


"War is about destruction and violence and death. It is young men fighting old men's wars. It is not the answer, it just ravages the land of the battleground. I know it's wrong but other people in the military have been programmed to think it is OK."

Aman, Mr. Funk.

What do you guys think--traitor? coward? or a man who could had to face killing under any circumstances?

and should he be tried? He said he is willing to face the consequences of his actions but, should you be forced to fight or face jail just because you sign up. couldn't they find him a desk job where he pushes paper or enters data...why must he be punished for not wanting to kill?

[Edited on 5-4-2003 by Saphronia]


reply posted on 6-4-2003 @ 05:22 AM by 5POF
First I'll attack the Marine, I think he's an idiot, he thinks the war is for "bad reasons". Well he should go back to Nazi Germany.

Now for you Saphroina.

Not bad...not bad indeed, but I disagree with you in the aspect of where you say "That's Brainwashing."

It's a volunteer service, until you sign, then you're Government Property.

This has been the way since the end of Feudalism, over 400 years ago. And was this way before Feudalism forever, the ancient Greeks 4000 years ago would put the veterans in the back, so if the recruits decided to try and leave, they would get a spear in the back or gut.

The reason for this is several things. Cowardice and morality are hard to distinguish. Is he really against killing people, or is he too cowardly to do it.

Afterall, a war agains Iraq, there should be no problem fighting them, the people we are fighting are butchers, and almost as bad as Nazis, except they lack in the whole Anti-Christ point.

Another reason especially in the US military goes back to George Washington who found it hard to keep a standing army even when the cause was Devine (the Revolution lol).

The only difference, George Washington, a man whom all would agree as being far more moral and superior to ourselves.

Would shoot this man for defection.

The idea of "Conciencious Objection" really didn't surface as a problem until WW2, and then only 2 men were arrested for it. The others decided being a Combat Medic was fair enough.

This Marine signed saying he would fight America's wars.

And while backing out of this one may not be out of cowardice, it's certainly due to his stupidity.

The Marines are better off without him.


reply posted on 9-4-2003 @ 03:02 AM by 5POF
How can you punish that you ask Saphroina?

Simple, you wrap a rope around his neck and throw him off a Gallows.

If you get one consiencious objector who "gets away" with it, what happens when the fighting gets tough and the soldier just wants to go home?

"Oh screw you General, I'm outta here."

You may not believe it, but Draftees even when they HATE that they have been drafted, fight every bit as well as a Volunteer who loves to fight.

But if you start letting people leave a fight any time they wish, then you have a collapse, which is unacceptable and causes "routes" which is when the enemy, still in formations simply rounds up and slaughters a falling apart opponent.

It is those formations and organizations that win wars, do you think they just go "oh well I'll go over here, but not over there".

No it's, "I ain't going anywhere" but yet they do, and because they did, we won.

Reminds me of that "Blithe" kid on Band of Brothers (Great series).

The guy had an acute blindness that would trigger off and on, but no one knew about it, and he was very timid, hiding when the fighting was going on.

But good ol' Capt. Winters forced him to start shooting, and he shot a German Paratrooper, and took his little flower.

After that he was leading the pack, eventually took a bullet to the neck and died in '48 to complications from that wound.

But the point is, if he could just "consienciously object" any time he wanted to.

He'd have never fired a shot, ran off, and never helped to win the war in any way.

That's why this marine must be Court Martialed, which you know what that means
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 1 days ago with 9 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 4 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 2 days ago with 6 member flags
Pair Detained in Twitter Homeland Threat Mix-Up
  Posted 9 days ago with 5 member flags