posted on Sep, 18 2011 @ 08:23 AM
Originally posted by gaurdian2012
can I be one of the few to say I am not impressed how much did the optics (cameras) cost no hd 3d.
shame nasa shame is this what passes as cutting edge technology
I agree. I can't help but seriously ask myself 'If this were all done with computer
generated graphicsand scaled models, would I or anyone else know the difference?' I am sure
that real universe and our portion of it is beautiful and moving but anything NASA always leaves
a sour taste in my (and quite a few others) mouth. Once a liar, Always a liar, No??
No Stars/Stars/Less Stars/More Stars/Dimmer Stars/Brighter Stars/Black and White/Colour??
I was going to make a thread about this one as I haven't seen it posted. It is fairly conclusive.
A compulsory read for anyone still silly enough to unquestioningly believe anything NASA.
edit on 18-9-2011 by pshea38 because: fixed