It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by primoaurelius
..getting arrested for trying to split atoms in his kitchen
Originally posted by Propulsion
reply to post by SilentNoise
That is true, but the material could be used in a dirty nuke. It doesn't take but a few isotopes in your body to wreak havoc. If someone were to break it down into powder form, and release it from a plane or small explosive, it would be unfortunate for a great many people.....
DOE, NRC, and State are not able to fully account for U.S. nuclear material overseas that is subject to nuclear cooperation agreement terms because the agreements do not stipulate systematic reporting of such information, and there is no U.S. policy to pursue or obtain such information. U.S. nuclear cooperation agreements generally require that partners report inventory information upon request, however, DOE and NRC have not systematically sought such data. DOE and NRC do not have a comprehensive, detailed, current inventory of U.S. nuclear material--including weapon-usable material such as highly enriched uranium (HEU) and separated plutonium--overseas that includes the country, facility, and quantity of material. In addition, NRC and DOE could not fully account for the current location and disposition of U.S. HEU overseas in response to a 1992 congressional mandate......... GTRI officials told GAO that, of the approximately 17,500 kilograms of HEU exported from the United States, 12,400 kilograms are currently not eligible for return to the United States. Specifically, GTRI reported that over 10,000 kilograms of U.S. HEU are believed to be in fuels from reactors in Germany, France, and Japan that have no disposition pathways in the United States and are adequately protected. In addition, according to GTRI, 2,000 kilograms of transferred U.S. HEU are located primarily in European Atomic Energy Community countries and are currently in use or adequately protected. GAO suggests, among other things, that Congress consider directing DOE and NRC to compile an inventory of U.S. nuclear material overseas. DOE, NRC, and State generally disagreed with GAO's recommendations, including that they conduct annual inventory reconciliations with all partners, stating they were unnecessary. GAO continues to believe that its recommendations could help improve the accountability of U.S. nuclear material in foreign countries.
The US goverment has a team of radiological forensics experts that can trace to the source such materials in the aftermath of an attack..
Originally posted by silent thunderhave no accountability and the U.S. has no way to enforce control.
You don't see the US government giving radiation reports of what is coming over from Japan.
Originally posted by pthena
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
The US goverment has a team of radiological forensics experts that can trace to the source such materials in the aftermath of an attack..
And if a nuke went off somewhere, and the POTUS already had someone in mind to blame, would the forensics experts even be sent, or would they be told to just sign an already prepared report as to where it came form?