It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Where's That Radioactive Sulfur Now? Possibly In Your Pants

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 08:16 PM
link   

Where's That Radioactive Sulfur Now? Possibly In Your Pants


www.forbes.com

And if you’re a man, you may be interested to know that some miniscule portion of it could be in your testicles.
(visit the link for the full news article)


edit on 17-8-2011 by buskey because: (no reason given)

edit on Wed Aug 17 2011 by DontTreadOnMe because: fixed title




posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 08:16 PM
link   
Got your attention I bet.....comes as no surprise really, only a matter of time before the radioactivity from Japan begins to show in all kinds of places. It seems every day brings more and more stories of the radioactive fallout being discovered further and and further from the source.

Is any place on this planet going be safe after a few more months of this?

www.forbes.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 08:33 PM
link   
This is to clarify what the article is about for the people who just read the OP... (Where-as in, where is the explanation of what the article is about?)


When the news broke yesterday that a previously unreported type of fallout from Fukushima—radioactive sulfur—had reached the United States in late March, nearly all mainstream media reports made the claim that it poses no threat to the health of Americans.

But none of them explained where the radioactive sulfur went. And if you’re a man, you may be interested to know that some miniscule portion of it could be in your testicles.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 08:35 PM
link   
Not sure why it cut off the full headline I inserted from the article???

"Where's That Radioactive Sulfur Now? Possibly In Your Pants

Sorry for the mystery.....
edit on 17-8-2011 by buskey because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 08:37 PM
link   
So is it harmless or not? Not really getting a straight answer in the article.

Glad I do not live in California though. It sucks that problems on the other side of the world affect the family jewels. I would have concern about this possibly adding to the risks of testicular cancer.




Many scientists agree such tiny amounts of radiation pose no risk—except for those scientists who contend that all additional radiation poses additional risk.






Raist
edit on 8/17/11 by Raist because: nm OP fixed title.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 08:38 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 08:42 PM
link   
good find op! I don't know what course of action can be taken, but glad you posted this.



posted on Aug, 17 2011 @ 08:51 PM
link   
So i should have more sex, right?

yessir, sounds like a plan, gonna get right on that.




new topics

top topics



 
3

log in

join