planet x nibiru or a glare?, page 2

reply to post by burntoast

---

Um, no it doesn't. It's glare. It's not a moon, a sun, a planet. It happens to thousands of people daily who take pictures with bright lights. As a matter of fact, you picture is obviously a simple glare. Please, this is nothing and you want it so bad to be something, it's a little sad frankly. Then again, maybe there is some planetary object out there that is impossible for anyone but you and you camera phone to see? Must be!

CJ

reply to post by stereologist

---

also note cheap camera cell phones dont filter out infrared light the human eye does and newer cameras do but the older or cheaper ones dont surrealcolor.110mb.com...

also remember infra red is the same wavelength that nasa's WISE telescope www.nasa.gov... is and which nasa themselves said is the only thing that could see cold bodies planets or bwon dwarfs

www.nasa.gov...

In November 2010, the scientific journal Icarus published a paper by astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire, who proposed the existence of a binary companion to our sun, larger than Jupiter, in the long-hypothesized "Oort cloud" -- a faraway repository of small icy bodies at the edge of our solar system. The researchers use the name "Tyche" for the hypothetical planet. Their paper argues that evidence for the planet would have been recorded by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE).

perhaps when the op played with his camera settings he found a setting which allows some of the infra red through after all "The IR light from 700-1000nm that goes to each of these RGB sensors gets translated electronically from IR to a red or green or blue value" surrealcolor.110mb.com...

also if it is infrared then it would not reflect in the water imo which explains that lack of reflection

i think the op should grab his camera turn that feature back on and go take a bunch more photo's of more sunsets (time of day, maybe try sunrise to?) he should also tell us what kinda camera phone is it? how old is it? etc

Originally posted by burntoast
uploading pic from my phone to my laptop and i came across this pic:




i did mess with the color effect on my phone. which was"solarize" i also then changed it back to some other ones to test my color effects and came up with just regular pics with no circle



and i also have a pic right after the 7:44 which is at 7:45pm

well first idk if its a lens glare due to the way i changed the color effect or something else.

could this really be there but only hidden from our eyes and only seen through other ways >?

have a look at this thread.. seems to have similarities to yours.. being over the water.. you may find some answers.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

all i can tell you is.. it is very unlikely that it is a huge undetected planet in our solar system..



edit to add... actually scrap that.. the video in the thread doesnt work anymore...

reply to post by pryingopen3rdeye

---

also remember infra red is the same wavelength that nasa's WISE telescope www.nasa.gov... is and which nasa themselves said is the only thing that could see cold bodies planets or bwon dwarfs

Not exactly. Infrared is a wide range of frequencies and cheapo cameras are not responding to the range as WISE does. Don't forget that the atmosphere filters out or distorts much of the signal which is why IR probes are placed in space.

The important issue is that if there were an object anywhere within the orbit of Saturn or probably even as far out as Uranus, the object would reflect enough light from the Sun to be visible.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by pryingopen3rdeye

---

also remember infra red is the same wavelength that nasa's WISE telescope www.nasa.gov... is and which nasa themselves said is the only thing that could see cold bodies planets or brown dwarfs

Not exactly. Infrared is a wide range of frequencies and cheapo cameras are not responding to the range as WISE does. Don't forget that the atmosphere filters out or distorts much of the signal which is why IR probes are placed in space.

The important issue is that if there were an object anywhere within the orbit of Saturn or probably even as far out as Uranus, the object would reflect enough light from the Sun to be visible.

you are assuming its reflective ability, you would have to assume what it is made up of in order to determine if it would be reflective or not, ice reflects a whole lot better then rock for example,

i still think the op ought to get out there and retry

reply to post by pryingopen3rdeye

---

you are assuming its reflective ability, you would have to assume what it is made up of in order to determine if it would be reflective or not, ice reflects a whole lot better then rock for example,

i still think the op ought to get out there and retry

Actually, I am not. All object are reflective. The Moon is a poor reflector yet it shines brightly at night.

Here I am supposing the ability to see the object WITH the unaided eye.

As far as IR goes, a cheapo camera has a limited IR range. The absorption and scattering of the atmosphere makes IR imagery through the atmosphere fairly useless.

You guys should check out this video by Neil Degrasse Tyson. He logically debunks 2012 hoax.

www.youtube.com...

May 20/21, 2012: the true meaning.
  Posted 9 days ago with 25 member flags

Cool Eclipse pictures (Earth, Moon, Sun, Pleiades)
  Posted 9 days ago with 24 member flags

Why the 2012 Phenomenon is Real!
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags

Nebula or Nibiru (May 28 2012)
  Posted 2 days ago with 19 member flags

World Message: Beginning May 26 thru Dec 21
  Posted 11 days ago with 14 member flags

newly discovered mayan calendars go beyond 2012
  Posted 19 days ago with 12 member flags

OMG: 2012 KP24 Incoming! Are we Doomed?
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags

Secret rogue planet may be hiding behind Neptune
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: