U.S. loses AAA credit rating from S&P, page 27
Pages: <<  24    25    26    27  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 144 times


reply posted on 11-8-2011 @ 12:46 PM by gorgi
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by gorgi
Originally posted by ThePublicEnemyNo1
I'm still confused as to why I had to pay taxes but corporations like G.E. didn't

I mean really...not one dime did GE pay?

Isn't it true that the Internal Revenue Service is a privately owned company
Isn't it true that the FDIC is a privately owned company

I think I'm getting sick


Let me help clarify this then for since you are confused.
GE did pay taxes.
The IRS is not a privately owned company
FDIC is not a privately owned company.

Feel better ?



Why are you confusing him further on purpose? GE made a $10.3b pre-tax profit in 2010, and paid...wait for it...waaaaaait for it...
ZERO INCOME TAXES. Even worse, they got a $1.1b tax benefit. And if you think that was a single incident, in 2008, their effective tax rate was 5.3% (lol) and 15% in 2007. The corporate tax rate in the US is 35%...but yeah, everything's fine, right?

Before you say "but they create jobs"...no they didn't, they let more people go since 2007
edit on 11-8-2011 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)


Yes GE did pay taxes.

Did GE get a $3.2 billion tax refund? No.
Did GE pay U.S. income taxes in 2010? Yes, it paid estimated taxes for 2010 and made payments for previous years. Think of it as your having paid withholding taxes on your salary in 2010 and sending the IRS a check on April 15, 2010, covering your balance owed for 2009.
Will GE ultimately pay U.S. income taxes for 2010? After much to-ing and fro-ing — the company says it hasn’t completed its 2010 tax return — GE now says that it will.


Source

GE did pay taxes and if you did bother to actually do some research you would have already known this. Dont always blindly follow.


reply posted on 11-8-2011 @ 01:20 PM by MrXYZ
reply to post by gorgi



From the very same article you posted:



Samuels said at a tax forum in February that GE needs a tax system that will let it compete effectively with such giant, foreign-based multinationals as Mitsubishi, Siemens and Phillips. However, their effective tax rates for earnings purposes last year were 40 percent, 31 percent and 26 percent, respectively, compared with 7 percent for GE. (GE says its tax rate has been artificially low in past years and will rise.)




The company says it’s not getting any refund for 2010 — validating Outslay’s analysis. Its 2010 tax situation? “We expect to have a small U.S. income tax liability for 2010,” said Gary Sheffer, GE’s chief spokesman. How big is small? GE declined to say.


Another interesting fact, the numbers they handed over to the IRS don't match those in shareholder reports

Also, another tactic they use is to accrue losses in the US that were really generated abroad. Taht way, their tax burden is lower...all it takes is some creative accounting. Hell, they say they need this to compete with other multinational companies, and in the very same sentence admit that their tax rate is only around 25% of it's closest competitor. Hell, against another competitor, it's only 16%

And lastly, the government allows them to DEFER TAXES generated abroad INDEFINITELY!!


reply posted on 13-8-2011 @ 01:23 AM by ThePublicEnemyNo1
reply to post by gorgi



The word I should have used for the FDIC is independent, not private...thanks for the clarification.


reply posted on 13-8-2011 @ 12:41 PM by EarthCitizen07
With a 14 trillion dollar deficit its quite amazing the USA was able to maintain a triple A rating for so long. Then throw in the hypocritical republican tantrums to cut spending by cutting down on social security payments, eventhough republicans spend two to three times as much democrat administrations(provable by GAO documents), and what happened was nothing of a suprise. Just demoralizing and aggraviting for people who have maxed out their social security trust fund and now are threatened by the republicans.

Clinton was the last sensible president to balance the budget and did not need to borrow a dime. I agree we need to reduce the deficit but the question becomes what is the best tolerable option. The timing is really bad since people are suffering from unemployment and thus governement is unable to collect the appropriate taxes. George Bush Jr gave lots of tax breaks to the wealthy elite and combined with the banker bailouts, increase in beauracracy via the patriot act (including increased spending for counter-terrorism) and the foreign wars in iraq, afghanistan and libya we are in dire straights.

The government has no choice but to keep raising the debt ceiling for as long as it takes to get the economy back on track and all the other glitches worked out. To be honest I don't see us getting out of this global recession anytime soon since most of the policies do NOT make sense; no tariffs on imports and the illegal mexican immigration crisis are driving the wages way down and jobs are getting more and more scarce. Clearly something is wrong with the whole system; they want globalisation at all costs for reasons we can only speculate on.

Pages: <<  24    25    26    27  >>    ^^TOP^^



Iranian sailors chase off pirates attacking U.S. ship
  Posted 5 days ago with 95 member flags
Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban
  Posted 9 days ago with 73 member flags
BBC Caught In Syria Massacre Propaganda Hoax
  Posted 1 days ago with 68 member flags
Man Loses $22,000 In New \'Policing For Profit\' Case
  Posted 7 days ago with 63 member flags
Bin Laden died of natural causes: Former CIA agent
  Posted 9 days ago with 58 member flags