It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Back in the Great Depression, President Roosevelt thought it was necessary to reinvest in our country and put Americans to work building our nation’s infrastructure. His programs put thousands of people to work, and increased the country’s workforce. The Republican party back then, much like today, pushed for austerity measures. The national debt was too high. We couldn’t afford to do these things, is what told President Roosevelt. FDR gave the GOP what they wanted and decreased spending in 1937. What happened next is exactly what happens to all economies when the cash flow stops moving, it dips into a recession or worse”
“It is starting to look like 1937 all over again. As the table below indicates, the economy made a significant recovery after hitting bottom in 1932, when real gross domestic product fell 13 percent. The contraction moderated considerably in 1933, and in 1934 growth was robust, with real G.D.P. rising 11 percent. Growth was also strong in 1935 and 1936, which brought the unemployment rate down more than half from its peak and relieved the devastating deflation that was at the root of the economy’s problems”
.
By 1937, President Roosevelt and the Federal Reserve thought self-sustaining growth had been restored and began worrying about unwinding the fiscal and monetary stimulus, which they thought would become a drag on growth and a source of inflation. There was also a strong desire to return to normality, in both monetary and fiscal policy
On the fiscal side, Roosevelt was under pressure from his Treasury secretary, Henry Morgenthau, to balance the budget. Like many conservatives today, Mr. Morgenthau worried obsessively about business confidence and was convinced that balancing the budget would be expansionary. In the words of the historian John Morton Blum, Mr. Morgenthau said he believed recovery “depended on the willingness of business to increase investments, and this in turn was a function of business confidence,” adding, “In his view only a balanced budget could sustain that confidence.”
Due to FDR caving to GOP demands back then, much like President Obama today, the gross domestic product plunged, 3.4 percent in 1938, and the unemployment rate rose to 12.5 percent from 9.2 percent in 1937.
It seems we are about to repeat this scenario again. The GOP has forced the President’s hand to make dramatic cuts because of the looming debt ceiling default. This may plunge the United States back into a deep recession that could last another year.
What happens a year from now? The Presidential election, and regardless of what the White House says, unemployment will matter in this election and the Republican Party knows that an improving economy means Obama will be re-elected and that they could also lose the House to Democrats again”
The reason that we are seeing no relief in the markets from the budget deal is that no real cuts in spending were agreed upon. Just more Washington side stepping.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
The largest single-policy contributor to the deficit are the BUSH TAX CUTS. Revenue increases need to happen at the same time as spending cuts to solve this issue. Sadly, some (you know who they are) are totally against fixing tax loop holes for companies like Exxon, or increasing the tax rate for the top 1%.
www.politicsdaily.com...
New York-Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell: $15 million
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center: $25 million
The Hospital for Special Surgery: $26 million
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: $30 million
Prostate Cancer Foundation: $41 million
Deerfield Academy: $68 million
Lincoln Center's NY State Theater: $100 million
Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $139 million
Okay, so let's completely abolish the "Bush Tax Cuts". What exactly is that going to accomplish, in the grand scheme?
The projected 2011 deficit is $1.6 trillion... The total of the AGI for the top 1% of taxpayers is $1.685 trillion...
So, if you stole every penny earned from the top 1%, you will have only paid the deficit and still not have touched the $14.5 trillion debt.
It was announced that our debt has now surpassed our GDP. To pay off the debt would require stealing every penny earned from every man, woman and child. And what would we call that?
Originally posted by MrXYZ
The projected 2011 deficit is $1.6 trillion... The total of the AGI for the top 1% of taxpayers is $1.685 trillion...
So, if you stole every penny earned from the top 1%, you will have only paid the deficit and still not have touched the $14.5 trillion debt.
So wait...if you force the top 1% to pay their fair share, after they got tax reduction after tax reduction ever since Reagan, that's called stealing. But taking the money out of social security, the money people paid into all their life, that's NOT stealing. Suuuuuuuuure, makes total sense.