It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Earth once had two moons, which merged in a slow-motion collision that took several hours to complete, researchers propose in Nature today.
that the infant Moon rapidly swept up any rivals or gravitationally ejected them into interstellar space, the new theory suggests that one body survived, parked in a gravitationally stable point in the Earth–Moon system.
The Moon's visible side is dominated by low-lying lava plains, whereas its farside is composed of highlands...
...What this suggests, Asphaug says, is that something 'squished' the late-solidifying KREEP layer to one side of the Moon, well after the rest of the crust had solidified. An impact, he believes, is the most likely explanation.
Apshaug's theory isn't the only attempt to explain the lunar dichotomy. Others have invoked tidal effects from Earth's gravity, or convective forces from cooling rocks in the Moon's mantle.
Originally posted by Griffo
I decided to put it here instead of Space Exploration, because it isn't really exploration.
This is the new striking news that indicates that earth may infact have had two moons earlier on in its life.
Earth once had two moons, which merged in a slow-motion collision that took several hours to complete, researchers propose in Nature today.
Contrary to the popular belief, which states
that the infant Moon rapidly swept up any rivals or gravitationally ejected them into interstellar space, the new theory suggests that one body survived, parked in a gravitationally stable point in the Earth–Moon system.
What is the evidence for this?
The Moon's visible side is dominated by low-lying lava plains, whereas its farside is composed of highlands...
...What this suggests, Asphaug says, is that something 'squished' the late-solidifying KREEP layer to one side of the Moon, well after the rest of the crust had solidified. An impact, he believes, is the most likely explanation.
I can't really see the benefits of this discovery, but I suppose it's good to know. Although it did add two other likely scenarios that could explain how the moon looks that way
Apshaug's theory isn't the only attempt to explain the lunar dichotomy. Others have invoked tidal effects from Earth's gravity, or convective forces from cooling rocks in the Moon's mantle.
Early Earth may have had two moons