Lockheed Martin's HALE-D airship learns to fly, makes a crash landing, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 28-7-2011 @ 06:22 PM by 1825114
You/whoever wrote that article are either ignorant on the subject or being very disingenuous with this "antiquated," "left behind," "just now being tried again" stuff.

these are from a few years ago and they're far from the only ones...





articles.latimes.com...


Pentagon plans blimp to spy from new heights
The giant dirigible would use radar to closely and constantly monitor activity on the ground from 65,000 feet.

March 13, 2009|Julian E. Barnes

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon said Thursday that it intends to spend $400 million to develop a giant dirigible that will float 65,000 feet above the Earth for 10 years, providing unblinking and intricate radar surveillance of the vehicles, planes and even people below.

"It is absolutely revolutionary," Werner J.A. Dahm, chief scientist for the Air Force, said of the proposed unmanned airship -- describing it as a cross between a satellite and a spy plane.

The 450-foot-long craft would give the U.S. military a better understanding of an adversary's movements, habits and tactics, officials said. And the ability to constantly monitor small movements in a wide area -- the Afghanistan- Pakistan border, for example -- would dramatically improve military intelligence.

"It is constant surveillance, uninterrupted," Dahm said. "When you only have a short-time view -- whether it is a few hours or a few days -- that is not enough to put the picture together."

The project reflects a shift in Pentagon planning and spending priorities under Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who has urged the military services to improve intelligence and surveillance operations while cutting high-tech weaponry costs.

If successful, the dirigible -- the brainchild of the Air Force and the Pentagon's research arm -- could pave the way for a fleet of spy airships, military officials said.

...


It's just like every single other news item with military implications... Any time it's in the news they talk about it like "it's the first time ever," or "they're just testing something minor out, nevermind all the major stuff connected to it"
edit on 28-7-2011 by 1825114 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 28-7-2011 @ 06:37 PM by PhoenixOD
reply to post by 1825114



Maybe you misread the quote in the OP 1825114?


Lockheed Martin and the US Army have teamed up to bring the quaint technology back into our hyper-modern era.


I dont think anyone is suggesting this is a new idea.



edit on 28-7-2011 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 28-7-2011 @ 06:43 PM by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
reply to
post by 1825114



Maybe you misread the quote in the OP 1825114?


Lockheed Martin and the US Army have teamed up to bring the quaint technology back into our hyper-modern era.


I dont think anyone is suggesting this is a new idea.


He didn't say they had said it was a new idea - he said that it wasn't antiquated, or "left behind" - because blimps have been in almost constant use since WW2 - ie they are modern, up to date, techologically advanced, etc.


reply posted on 28-7-2011 @ 06:46 PM by PhoenixOD
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul



ahh , my mistake

Heres another Lockheed airship from a few years back.




edit on 28-7-2011 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 28-7-2011 @ 09:41 PM by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
reply to
post by Aloysius the Gaul



Heres another Lockheed airship from a few years back.



Yep - there's already a thread about it www.abovetopsecret.com...

Note my post there where I link to a "Depleted Cranium" article about why airships will never be any use as heavy cargo lifters.


reply posted on 29-7-2011 @ 01:49 AM by PhoenixOD
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul




Indeed - and the OP link mentions dirigibles - rigid airships - which this is not - it is a "blimp" - a non-rigid airship .


I dont profess to be an expert on the subject but It seems dirigible doesnt mean rigid a rigid craft


An airship or dirigible is a type of aerostat or "lighter-than-air aircraft" that can be steered and propelled through the air using rudders and propellers or other thrust mechanisms. Unlike aerodynamic aircraft such as fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters, which produce lift by moving a wing through the air, aerostatic aircraft stay aloft by having a large "envelope" filled with a gas which is less dense than the surrounding atmosphere. In the past hydrogen was generally used, but nowadays helium is preferred because of its lack of flammability.


Source Wiki


A dirigible is any lighter-than-air craft that is both powered and steerable (as opposed to free floating, like a balloon). Blimps like the Goodyear blimp, rigid airships like the Hindenburg, and semi-rigid airships like the Zeppelin NT are all dirigibles.

The word “dirigible” is often associated with large rigid airships, but the term does not come from the word “rigid,” but rather the French verb “diriger” (“to steer”).


Source Airship.net

edit on 29-7-2011 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Amazing video of 747 lifting in place in extreme wind conditions
  Posted 3 days ago with 11 member flags
Eerie Second World War RAF fighter plane discovered in the Sahara
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags
Stealth chopper based in Nevada
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
HIFiRE Scramjet Research Flight Will Advance Hypersonic Technology
  Posted 16 days ago with 2 member flags
My CAF (Canadian armed forces) friend and his work on the TRS-2
  Posted 1 days ago with 2 member flags