When I saw this headline I thought "oh here we go, already looking for reasons for a retrial" - but apparently I'm wrong.
Not only did the site owner make a mistake in how many times the site was visited (alleged to be 86), he ADMITTED that it was only ONCE, while the
trial was still going on.
Whoever he informed, never bothered to bring it up.
Luckily the jurors were only going off 1 search that lasted only 3 minutes.
Just one more reason to hang the prosecution IMHO - they went into it too quickly and failed to provide any real evidence.
www.huffingtonpost.com
(visit the link for the full news article)


