Age of the Sphinx, A glaring issue about it's age!, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 115 times


reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 05:04 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by lifeform11



Well I'm guessing you're saying the body was excavated and exposed while the temple wasn't exposed but still buried?

It's possible but it still doesnt explain why the face/head is such good condition though


reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 05:09 PM by lifeform11
reply to post by SLAYER69



but i was not even attempting to answer that question, i was only attempting to answer why the sphinx is more weathered than the structure lower down, which the o.p. was pointing out.

the o.p. even includes a drawing i assume was a artists sketch or a representation of what the sphinx once look like and it clearly shows that everything else was buried untill the excavations started.



reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 05:24 PM by Blackmarketeer
There's absolutely no evidence that the Sphinx was a "sphinx" in 10,000 BC. A sizable protrusion of limestone, yes, and maybe even a landmark of sorts to ancient peoples that came and went through that region, but not a sphinx.

The inventory stele does imply that Khufu restored the Sphinx (as opposed to the idea he created it) but what exactly was he restoring? The sphinx as we know it, or some earlier simpler and cruder carving?

Long live The King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Khufu, given life
He found the house of Isis, Mistress of the Pyramid, by the side of the hollow of Hwran (The Sphinx) and he built his pyramid beside the temple of this goddess and he built a pyramid for the King's daughter Henutsen beside this temple.
The place of Hwran Horemakhet is on the South side of the House of Isis, Mistress of the pyramid
He restored the statue, all covered in painting, of the guardian of the atmosphere, who guides the winds with his gaze.
He replaced the back part of the Nemes head-dress, which was missing with gilded stone
The figure of this god, cut in stone, is solid and will last to eternity, keeping its face looking always to the East.


A portion of the "neme" (the headdress) is indeed stylistically from Khufu's time. The rest of the headdress is a style from Khafre's time, who is also credited with creating the Sphinx's body, and that has been scientifically proven by a match between the limestone used in the temple he built using stone excavated from the U-shaped channel that surrounds the Sphinx.

Khafre also used blocks of tura limestone to extend the body past a natural fissure found when carving it, which some contribute to giving rise to the notion the head is "too small" for the body, by having extended it too far. I suppose the alternative Khafre had to consider was to shorten the body up (and eliminating the fissure all together), which would probably look even stranger.

You can debate all day long whether the Sphinx existed as a true sphinx prior to Khufu, the fact is, a large, natural limestone feature jutting above the surrounding terrain is bound to attract native peoples who will carve something from it or into it. It may have started out as simple primitive carvings and progressed to various representations of deities until finally it was turned into the Sphinx we all know today by Khufu/Khafre.
edit on 11-7-2011 by Blackmarketeer because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 05:32 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by Blackmarketeer




Excellent point. I was going to post a reference to the Stella. I forgot about it.

Great point. I too think it is older than many would like to recognize but I'm still not sure about the possibility of the extreme age some would like to give it though.


reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 06:36 PM by LadyTrick
reply to post by Backslider



no it wasn't that one, the only version i can find isn't in english unfortunatly.

www.youtube.com...



reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 07:17 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by mblahnikluver



I love reading about all of ancient Egypt, Sumeria etc etc etc


reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 07:42 PM by Drala
reply to post by larnhr



Crazy 1, 10 000 bc was an iceage...might have to go 1 more processional cycle add 25 920 more years....closer to 36 000. and I bet that was the aim to have it completed to align with leo...so probably building it was even earlier..

I am sure alot of people are starting to wake up to the misconceptions...

Like the pyramid tombs....tell me a mummy that was found in a pyramid....stop thinking...there was none....LMAO...IS HISTORY A LIE?? I think it was the best we could come up with...but now we can come up with better...time to rewrite history


reply posted on 11-7-2011 @ 07:57 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by Drala



I wouldnt say it's a lie.
I just question our belief in a straight forward linear progression of advancement sometimes
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



More Mysterious Nazca Lines From Space
  Posted 6 days ago with 124 member flags
The Aztec and Norse god of war are both missing one hand.
  Posted 17 days ago with 48 member flags
63,000-Year-Old Modern Human Skull Found in Laos
  Posted 18 days ago with 38 member flags
Multiple Human Species Were Likely The Norm
  Posted 11 days ago with 37 member flags
The Sumerian \'Flood-Storm\' weapon.
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags