It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NATO airstrike kills 8 Libyan civilians! Looks like it happened again!

page: 2
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 30 2011 @ 10:04 AM
link   

edit on 30-6-2011 by Paulioetc15 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 30 2011 @ 10:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi

Originally posted by Paulioetc15
is America doing the aerial bombing of Libya lately? Check again, America handed over to our NATO allies to do the aerial-bombing.


You can bet your ass that the US spent this time bolstering regional forces and preparing for more wars (such as a ground invasion of Libya and Syria).

LOL if Obama ever send our ground troops, he will be toasted in the 2012 election. Plus i'm happy to see that most of our NATO allies carry the burden on this one because we already bulked down in Libya and Afghanistan.




The last sentence i mentioned about Libya whoops i mean iraq.



posted on Jun, 30 2011 @ 12:38 PM
link   
Big deal....when we killed innocent Iraqi's we only had to pay the family $2,000.

What's an innocent Libyan cost us? $50?

In America if you shoot your neighbors dog it'll cost you more than if you killed an Iraqi AND a Libyan. ha ha ha!!



posted on Jun, 30 2011 @ 01:22 PM
link   
Gaddafi is placing his military command and control radio transmitters in civilian neighborhoods so they will become targets.

He is using civilians as human shields and that is a war crime.

The only way to target these command and control radio transmitters is with beam rider missiles and just as NATO fires his commanders switch to the transmitters in civilian areas and redirects the missiles



posted on Jun, 30 2011 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by ANNED
 


Regardless what Gaddafi is doing, we should not be bombing Libya. It was an internal matter, and they should have been left to handle it on their own.

Instead, we sent in people to help a small band of discontents overwhelm what the majority was legitimizing, whether it was democratic or not. And when even sending in terrorists to help the "rebels" didnt work, we pushed through a "no fly zone" on some trumped up charges he was "air striking civilians" so we (the allies) could bomb the crap out of them.

Their real "crime" wasnt what Gaddafi did to his "people" which in the US would have been labeled "domestic terrorists" and likely killed even more quickly if they tried that here, it was being a socialist country who wouldnt let international banksters and oil companies in to rape the nation of its resources.



posted on Jun, 30 2011 @ 05:02 PM
link   
reply to post by ANNED
 


I completely agree with you.



posted on Jul, 1 2011 @ 12:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by steppenwolf86
As for the US supplying money and arms... What are you smoking?


I'll ask you the same question. The Americans were funneling weapons and cash straight to the "rebels" even before the NFZ. CIA/SAS/JTF-2 were all reported to be operating in Libya weeks before the NFZ, where they were inserted under the guise of Western countries sending in transport planes to extract their citizens. They went on to open up logistic lines (which brought in cash and weapons), set up training camps, mark out targets for bombing, and promote assassination of Gaddafi's government officials.

I don't know why you went off about French using their own weapons. I meant the fact that the involved countries were supporting the "rebels" from the start with cash and weapons. Interesting how the "rebels" set up a central bank weeks into their struggle so the IMF could throw more cash at them, eh?

It must be quite ironic to you to know that as soon as these weapons were handed to the rebels, they were being distributed all over the region through their Muslim Brotherhood contacts (aka Al Qaeda). So in effect, supplying the "rebels" with weapons and cash only bolstered their regional struggle, which would justify more western troop presence there.

Even the whole "Arab Spring" crap was discovered to be funded by the Pentagon



posted on Jul, 1 2011 @ 03:29 AM
link   
Did I not ask to refrain from the NWO theories?



posted on Jul, 1 2011 @ 09:38 AM
link   
reply to post by steppenwolf86
 


nah dimitri is just a brainwashed moron i supposed.



posted on Jul, 1 2011 @ 10:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Paulioetc15
reply to post by steppenwolf86
 


nah dimitri is just a brainwashed moron i supposed.


Yes, the guy acting on his own and against the flow is the "brainwashed moron"


And where did I bring up any NWO talk? I personally don't believe that any NWO is being schemed by parties competent enough to implement it, so when do I ever bring it up?




top topics



 
5
<< 1   >>

log in

join