It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Darkwing01
My statement was an answer to a question you asked in response to my request for you to prove that this was NOT molten iron.
1) Why do you think it is NOT molten iron and on what basis do you come to that conclusion?
2) What part about this stuff looking like and behaving like molten iron and not looking like and behaving anything else is NOT reproducible in physical experiment?
The fact that YOUR answer failed to address this point was taken by yours truly to be an indication that you can't, hence my reply.
Comparing e-peens now? How much "science" have you done?
In any event this is the natural way in which the brain works to learn about the physical world, so I like you have done a fair bit, as have you. The only difference is that I am aware of it while you are in a slumber.
The world is full of wonderful things that will forever remain mysterious.
What is not mysterious is that you have failed to furnish an example of the magical material you purport looks and behaves like the stuff coming out the window and is not iron.
If it does then you can demonstrate it empirically and we can all go home.
The problem for you is that there are plenty of possible experiments we could do, except you know as well as I do that they all falsify your position.
ALL the information points that there is for all intents and purposes zero percent likelihood that it was anything BUT molten iron, yet you cling to your 100% certainty that it was not.
The only possible reason is your political views so we can infer them inductively right there.
I am not trying to change anything,
I don't base my concept of reality on what is accepted or who it is accepted by.
Why are you here if you are so sure of your position, why are you trying to convince. WHO are you trying convince?edit on 11-7-2011 by Darkwing01 because: (no reason given)
1) It could be lots of other things. I think it's probably aluminium mixed with all kinds of other stuff from the towers. The colour is plausible. If it's evidence of steel being cut then why is the building not falling down? And why is it the only example? 2) What value would there be in such an experiment? The fact that something can be made to look like something else proves nothing. It just shows that it could be molten oiron. But that doesn't really help you.
1) Why do you think it is NOT molten iron and on what basis do you come to that conclusion? 2) What part about this stuff looking like and behaving like molten iron and not looking like and behaving anything else is NOT reproducible in physical experiment?