posted on Jun, 24 2011 @ 12:37 AM
This link will connect you with the movie I am talking about. I watched the movie and thought it to be very interesting. It tells and explain to us
how this economic crisis started and almost caused an other 1928 economic disaster. I didn't know that the US government held the banks responsible
and forced them to pay up for the crisis they caused. The last few scenes where Paulson is expecting (with doubt) that the banks will use the bail-out
money for the people is also worth thinking about.
The banks assumed that the house market would never fail and everybody was making big money of it....nobody was interested in legislation and
protecting the consumer from himself.
Because I do not much know about financial markets I wonder if the movie really tells the true story. And as an other person commented.....what about
the Arabs, they have the money and are nowhere to be seen or heared in this story. The western world bailed some of them out (Kuwait) and helped them
to become the richest nations in the world.
Anyways...I hear people say that the bail-out money used would have bought evrybody his home back and more of such 'better' solutions. But how I
understand it now it is the effort and solutions of the US gov. (and Paulson) that the world didn't collaps. But was it this really the only way to
save the economy or is the problem so immense that the solution will only delay the collaps...
There are some big names in this movie....can it be that the USD gov. wanted this movie to be made and inform the people about how it all went down?
(couldn't find any masonic symbols in the movie tho.....
Anybody else watched the movie and an opinion or ideas about the matter?
PS the english play a short but significant role in this story and almost caused everything to collaps in the US. Can this be the reason why Obama had
more important things to do on the weddingday of the britsh royal?
edit on 24-6-2011 by zatara because: forgot something